尼日利亚草药和传统药物的比较评估

K. Osemene, A. Elujoba, M. Ilori
{"title":"尼日利亚草药和传统药物的比较评估","authors":"K. Osemene, A. Elujoba, M. Ilori","doi":"10.4314/NJNPM.V17I1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper assessed the attributes of herbal and orthodox medicines such as affordability, packaging, availability, efficacy, safety, side-effects and level of advertisement in print and electronic media which were hitherto neglected. Structured questionnaires and interview schedule were the instruments used to elicit information from 300 herbal and orthodox medicine consumers selected from six geo-political zones in Nigeria through a purposive or convenient sampling method. Data were analyzed with appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics. Results showed that the respondents rated herbal medicines higher than orthodox medicines in terms of safety and degree of advertisement. Orthodox medicines were rated higher than herbal medicines in terms of affordability, packaging, availability, efficacy, and side-effects. The mean values of all parameters were significant at 0.05. Furthermore, only 41% of the respondents took herbal medicines as their first drug of choice. This finding is contrary to the widely held view in literature that more than 80% of the population in developing countries takes only herbal medicines. Key words: Assessment; Herbal and Orthodox Medicines; Nigeria","PeriodicalId":19356,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Natural Products and Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Assessment of Herbal and Orthodox Medicines in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"K. Osemene, A. Elujoba, M. Ilori\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/NJNPM.V17I1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper assessed the attributes of herbal and orthodox medicines such as affordability, packaging, availability, efficacy, safety, side-effects and level of advertisement in print and electronic media which were hitherto neglected. Structured questionnaires and interview schedule were the instruments used to elicit information from 300 herbal and orthodox medicine consumers selected from six geo-political zones in Nigeria through a purposive or convenient sampling method. Data were analyzed with appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics. Results showed that the respondents rated herbal medicines higher than orthodox medicines in terms of safety and degree of advertisement. Orthodox medicines were rated higher than herbal medicines in terms of affordability, packaging, availability, efficacy, and side-effects. The mean values of all parameters were significant at 0.05. Furthermore, only 41% of the respondents took herbal medicines as their first drug of choice. This finding is contrary to the widely held view in literature that more than 80% of the population in developing countries takes only herbal medicines. Key words: Assessment; Herbal and Orthodox Medicines; Nigeria\",\"PeriodicalId\":19356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Natural Products and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"77-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Natural Products and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/NJNPM.V17I1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Natural Products and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/NJNPM.V17I1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

本文评估了草药和传统药物的属性,如可负担性,包装,可获得性,功效,安全性,副作用以及在印刷和电子媒体上的广告水平,这些迄今为止被忽视。通过有目的或方便的抽样方法,采用结构化问卷调查和访谈计划,从尼日利亚六个地缘政治区域中选出300名草药和传统药物消费者,以获取信息。对数据进行适当的描述性和推断性统计分析。结果显示,受访者对中草药的安全性和广告宣传程度的评价高于中药。在可负担性、包装、可获得性、疗效和副作用方面,传统药物的评级高于草药。所有参数的平均值均为0.05,差异有统计学意义。此外,只有41%的受访者将草药作为首选药物。这一发现与文献中广泛持有的观点相反,即发展中国家80%以上的人口只服用草药。关键词:考核;草药和传统药物;尼日利亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Assessment of Herbal and Orthodox Medicines in Nigeria
This paper assessed the attributes of herbal and orthodox medicines such as affordability, packaging, availability, efficacy, safety, side-effects and level of advertisement in print and electronic media which were hitherto neglected. Structured questionnaires and interview schedule were the instruments used to elicit information from 300 herbal and orthodox medicine consumers selected from six geo-political zones in Nigeria through a purposive or convenient sampling method. Data were analyzed with appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics. Results showed that the respondents rated herbal medicines higher than orthodox medicines in terms of safety and degree of advertisement. Orthodox medicines were rated higher than herbal medicines in terms of affordability, packaging, availability, efficacy, and side-effects. The mean values of all parameters were significant at 0.05. Furthermore, only 41% of the respondents took herbal medicines as their first drug of choice. This finding is contrary to the widely held view in literature that more than 80% of the population in developing countries takes only herbal medicines. Key words: Assessment; Herbal and Orthodox Medicines; Nigeria
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信