比较不同抽样方案估算果园产量和品质参数的效率

J. Arnó, J. A. Martínez-Casasnovas, A. Uribeetxebarria, A. Escolà, J. R. Rosell-Polo
{"title":"比较不同抽样方案估算果园产量和品质参数的效率","authors":"J. Arnó, J. A. Martínez-Casasnovas, A. Uribeetxebarria, A. Escolà, J. R. Rosell-Polo","doi":"10.1017/S2040470017000978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different sampling schemes were tested to estimate yield (kg/tree), fruit firmness (kg) and the refractometric index (oBaumé) in a peach orchard. In contrast to simple random sampling (SRS), the use of auxiliary information (NDVI and apparent electrical conductivity, ECa) allowed sampling points to be stratified according to two or three classes (strata) within the plot. Sampling schemes were compared in terms of accuracy and efficiency. Stratification of samples improved efficiency compared to SRS. However, yield and quality parameters may require different sampling strategies. While yield was better estimated using stratified samples based on the ECa, fruit quality (firmness and oBaumé) showed better results when stratifying by NDVI.","PeriodicalId":7228,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Animal Biosciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"471-476"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing efficiency of different sampling schemes to estimate yield and quality parameters in fruit orchards\",\"authors\":\"J. Arnó, J. A. Martínez-Casasnovas, A. Uribeetxebarria, A. Escolà, J. R. Rosell-Polo\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S2040470017000978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Different sampling schemes were tested to estimate yield (kg/tree), fruit firmness (kg) and the refractometric index (oBaumé) in a peach orchard. In contrast to simple random sampling (SRS), the use of auxiliary information (NDVI and apparent electrical conductivity, ECa) allowed sampling points to be stratified according to two or three classes (strata) within the plot. Sampling schemes were compared in terms of accuracy and efficiency. Stratification of samples improved efficiency compared to SRS. However, yield and quality parameters may require different sampling strategies. While yield was better estimated using stratified samples based on the ECa, fruit quality (firmness and oBaumé) showed better results when stratifying by NDVI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Animal Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"471-476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Animal Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040470017000978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Animal Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040470017000978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

试验了不同取样方案对桃园产量(kg/树)、果实硬度(kg)和折光指数(obaum)的估算。与简单随机抽样(SRS)相比,使用辅助信息(NDVI和视电导率,ECa)可以根据地块内的两个或三个类别(地层)对采样点进行分层。从精度和效率两个方面对抽样方案进行了比较。与SRS相比,样品分层提高了效率。然而,产率和质量参数可能需要不同的采样策略。虽然使用基于ECa的分层样品可以更好地估计产量,但使用NDVI分层时,果实质量(硬度和硬度)显示出更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing efficiency of different sampling schemes to estimate yield and quality parameters in fruit orchards
Different sampling schemes were tested to estimate yield (kg/tree), fruit firmness (kg) and the refractometric index (oBaumé) in a peach orchard. In contrast to simple random sampling (SRS), the use of auxiliary information (NDVI and apparent electrical conductivity, ECa) allowed sampling points to be stratified according to two or three classes (strata) within the plot. Sampling schemes were compared in terms of accuracy and efficiency. Stratification of samples improved efficiency compared to SRS. However, yield and quality parameters may require different sampling strategies. While yield was better estimated using stratified samples based on the ECa, fruit quality (firmness and oBaumé) showed better results when stratifying by NDVI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信