说谎的持久性

M. Belot, Jeroen van de Ven
{"title":"说谎的持久性","authors":"M. Belot, Jeroen van de Ven","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3256702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study experimentally if lying is persistent. In a strategic game, we manipulate the incentives to lie to others. Some participants are first exposed to high incentives and then lower incentives; for others the reverse. We conjectured that participants will lie more often when the incentives are high, and will continue to lie when the incentives are then reduced. Contrary to our expectation, we do not find any such persistence in behavior, and there even seems to be an overcompensation effect: participants formerly exposed to high incentives are less likely to lie when confronted with lower incentives than participants who were never exposed to high incentives. The overcompensation is still present (but not statistically significant) after correcting for a general time trend.","PeriodicalId":10477,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Persistence of Lying\",\"authors\":\"M. Belot, Jeroen van de Ven\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3256702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study experimentally if lying is persistent. In a strategic game, we manipulate the incentives to lie to others. Some participants are first exposed to high incentives and then lower incentives; for others the reverse. We conjectured that participants will lie more often when the incentives are high, and will continue to lie when the incentives are then reduced. Contrary to our expectation, we do not find any such persistence in behavior, and there even seems to be an overcompensation effect: participants formerly exposed to high incentives are less likely to lie when confronted with lower incentives than participants who were never exposed to high incentives. The overcompensation is still present (but not statistically significant) after correcting for a general time trend.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Social Science eJournal\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Social Science eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3256702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3256702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们通过实验研究说谎是否持久。在战略博弈中,我们操纵对他人撒谎的动机。一些参与者首先接触到高激励,然后是低激励;对其他人来说,情况正好相反。我们推测,当激励很高时,参与者会更频繁地撒谎,当激励降低时,他们会继续撒谎。与我们的预期相反,我们在行为中没有发现任何这种持久性,甚至似乎存在过度补偿效应:与从未接触过高激励的参与者相比,以前接触过高激励的参与者在面对低激励时更不可能撒谎。在对一般时间趋势进行校正后,过度补偿仍然存在(但在统计上不显著)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Persistence of Lying
We study experimentally if lying is persistent. In a strategic game, we manipulate the incentives to lie to others. Some participants are first exposed to high incentives and then lower incentives; for others the reverse. We conjectured that participants will lie more often when the incentives are high, and will continue to lie when the incentives are then reduced. Contrary to our expectation, we do not find any such persistence in behavior, and there even seems to be an overcompensation effect: participants formerly exposed to high incentives are less likely to lie when confronted with lower incentives than participants who were never exposed to high incentives. The overcompensation is still present (but not statistically significant) after correcting for a general time trend.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信