写作前和写作后显性指导:对二语学习者写作准确性的不同影响

IF 3.6 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Nguyen Huynh Trang, J. Barrot
{"title":"写作前和写作后显性指导:对二语学习者写作准确性的不同影响","authors":"Nguyen Huynh Trang, J. Barrot","doi":"10.1177/00336882231184270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This quasi-experimental study investigates the effects of pre-writing (Pre-EI) and post-writing explicit instruction (Post-EI) on L2 learners’ overall writing accuracy and errors at different severity levels. Situated within process-genre-oriented writing classrooms, a total of three intact groups ( N = 101) were designated as two experimental conditions (Pre-EI and Post-EI) and a control group (no explicit instruction). Overall, the improvement by the two treatment groups compared to the control group suggested that both Pre-EI and Post-EI were effective in improving learners’ overall writing accuracy and reducing level 2 and level 3 errors. However, the results of between-group comparisons revealed the superiority of Post-EI. These findings indicated that writing accuracy was conditional to both timing and availability and provided a more nuanced understanding of the differential effects of Pre-EI and Post-EI on writing accuracy. Implications for L2 writing pedagogy and future studies are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46946,"journal":{"name":"Relc Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-Writing and Post-Writing Explicit Instruction: Differential Effects on L2 Learners’ Writing Accuracy\",\"authors\":\"Nguyen Huynh Trang, J. Barrot\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00336882231184270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This quasi-experimental study investigates the effects of pre-writing (Pre-EI) and post-writing explicit instruction (Post-EI) on L2 learners’ overall writing accuracy and errors at different severity levels. Situated within process-genre-oriented writing classrooms, a total of three intact groups ( N = 101) were designated as two experimental conditions (Pre-EI and Post-EI) and a control group (no explicit instruction). Overall, the improvement by the two treatment groups compared to the control group suggested that both Pre-EI and Post-EI were effective in improving learners’ overall writing accuracy and reducing level 2 and level 3 errors. However, the results of between-group comparisons revealed the superiority of Post-EI. These findings indicated that writing accuracy was conditional to both timing and availability and provided a more nuanced understanding of the differential effects of Pre-EI and Post-EI on writing accuracy. Implications for L2 writing pedagogy and future studies are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Relc Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Relc Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231184270\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Relc Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231184270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本拟实验研究探讨了写作前(Pre-EI)和写作后显性指导(Post-EI)对二语学习者不同严重程度的整体写作准确性和错误的影响。在以过程体裁为导向的写作课堂中,共有三个完整组(N = 101)被指定为两个实验条件(ei前和ei后)和一个对照组(没有明确的指导)。总的来说,与对照组相比,两个治疗组的改善表明,Pre-EI和Post-EI都有效地提高了学习者的整体写作准确性,减少了2级和3级错误。然而,组间比较结果显示后ei的优势。这些发现表明,写作准确性取决于时间和可用性,并提供了对ei前和ei后对写作准确性的差异影响的更细致的理解。讨论了对第二语言写作教学和未来研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-Writing and Post-Writing Explicit Instruction: Differential Effects on L2 Learners’ Writing Accuracy
This quasi-experimental study investigates the effects of pre-writing (Pre-EI) and post-writing explicit instruction (Post-EI) on L2 learners’ overall writing accuracy and errors at different severity levels. Situated within process-genre-oriented writing classrooms, a total of three intact groups ( N = 101) were designated as two experimental conditions (Pre-EI and Post-EI) and a control group (no explicit instruction). Overall, the improvement by the two treatment groups compared to the control group suggested that both Pre-EI and Post-EI were effective in improving learners’ overall writing accuracy and reducing level 2 and level 3 errors. However, the results of between-group comparisons revealed the superiority of Post-EI. These findings indicated that writing accuracy was conditional to both timing and availability and provided a more nuanced understanding of the differential effects of Pre-EI and Post-EI on writing accuracy. Implications for L2 writing pedagogy and future studies are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Relc Journal
Relc Journal LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The RELC Journal is a fully peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language education. The aim of this Journal is to present information and ideas on theories, research, methods and materials related to language learning and teaching. Within this framework the Journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current enquiry as first and second language learning and teaching, language and culture, discourse analysis, language planning, language testing, multilingual education, stylistics, translation and information technology. The RELC Journal, therefore, is concerned with linguistics applied to education and contributions that have in mind the common professional concerns of both the practitioner and the researcher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信