{"title":"田纳西州统一仲裁法下的裁决撤销:实质、程序和从业者策略","authors":"Steven W. Feldman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2608985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act (TUAA). One of the most challenging TUAA topics is the action for vacatur (annulment) of an arbitral award. Because actions for vacatur are often the most hotly-disputed matters between the arbitral parties, this article focuses on this subject to assist practitioners in developing strategies to advance their clients’ interests.","PeriodicalId":87424,"journal":{"name":"The University of Memphis law review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vacatur of Awards Under the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act: Substance, Procedure, and Strategies for Practitioners\",\"authors\":\"Steven W. Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2608985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act (TUAA). One of the most challenging TUAA topics is the action for vacatur (annulment) of an arbitral award. Because actions for vacatur are often the most hotly-disputed matters between the arbitral parties, this article focuses on this subject to assist practitioners in developing strategies to advance their clients’ interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The University of Memphis law review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The University of Memphis law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2608985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The University of Memphis law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2608985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vacatur of Awards Under the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act: Substance, Procedure, and Strategies for Practitioners
This article analyzes the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act (TUAA). One of the most challenging TUAA topics is the action for vacatur (annulment) of an arbitral award. Because actions for vacatur are often the most hotly-disputed matters between the arbitral parties, this article focuses on this subject to assist practitioners in developing strategies to advance their clients’ interests.