婴儿母亲表征性心性的信度和效度

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
I. Egmose, Mia Skou, E. B. Madsen, A. C. Stuart, M. Krogh, T. W. Haase, M. Væver
{"title":"婴儿母亲表征性心性的信度和效度","authors":"I. Egmose, Mia Skou, E. B. Madsen, A. C. Stuart, M. Krogh, T. W. Haase, M. Væver","doi":"10.1080/17405629.2023.2209714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Mind-mindedness (MM) refers to the parent’s ability to treat the child as an individual with a mind of his or her own. Studies have found representational and interactional MM to predict child development, but more research is needed on the validity of representational MM in parents of infants. Therefore, we examine the reliability and validity of representational MM in 46 mothers of infants. Representational MM was measured at 4 and 11 months, and interactional MM at 11 months. The results supported the reliability of representational MM by showing a moderate rank-order stability over a 7-month-period, although the stability was due to associations between representational MM and maternal age. The results also supported the validity of representational MM by showing concurrent and longitudinal associations between representational and interactional MM. Finally, the results suggested that the capacity for appropriate mind-related comments is more stable than the tendency to use non-attuned mind-related comments.","PeriodicalId":47709,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Developmental Psychology","volume":"49 1","pages":"889 - 902"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of representational mind-mindedness in mothers of infants\",\"authors\":\"I. Egmose, Mia Skou, E. B. Madsen, A. C. Stuart, M. Krogh, T. W. Haase, M. Væver\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17405629.2023.2209714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Mind-mindedness (MM) refers to the parent’s ability to treat the child as an individual with a mind of his or her own. Studies have found representational and interactional MM to predict child development, but more research is needed on the validity of representational MM in parents of infants. Therefore, we examine the reliability and validity of representational MM in 46 mothers of infants. Representational MM was measured at 4 and 11 months, and interactional MM at 11 months. The results supported the reliability of representational MM by showing a moderate rank-order stability over a 7-month-period, although the stability was due to associations between representational MM and maternal age. The results also supported the validity of representational MM by showing concurrent and longitudinal associations between representational and interactional MM. Finally, the results suggested that the capacity for appropriate mind-related comments is more stable than the tendency to use non-attuned mind-related comments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Developmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"889 - 902\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Developmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2023.2209714\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2023.2209714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心智(MM)是指父母把孩子当作一个有自己思想的个体来对待的能力。研究已经发现表征性和交互性MM可以预测儿童的发展,但表征性MM在婴儿父母中的有效性还需要更多的研究。因此,我们在46名婴儿母亲中检验了代表性MM的信度和效度。代表性MM在4个月和11个月时测量,交互性MM在11个月时测量。结果通过显示在7个月期间适度的等级顺序稳定性来支持代表性MM的可靠性,尽管稳定性是由于代表性MM与母亲年龄之间的关联。研究结果还显示,表征性心理评论与交互性心理评论之间存在同步和纵向关联,从而支持表征性心理评论的有效性。最后,研究结果表明,适当心理评论的能力比使用非调谐心理评论的倾向更稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity of representational mind-mindedness in mothers of infants
ABSTRACT Mind-mindedness (MM) refers to the parent’s ability to treat the child as an individual with a mind of his or her own. Studies have found representational and interactional MM to predict child development, but more research is needed on the validity of representational MM in parents of infants. Therefore, we examine the reliability and validity of representational MM in 46 mothers of infants. Representational MM was measured at 4 and 11 months, and interactional MM at 11 months. The results supported the reliability of representational MM by showing a moderate rank-order stability over a 7-month-period, although the stability was due to associations between representational MM and maternal age. The results also supported the validity of representational MM by showing concurrent and longitudinal associations between representational and interactional MM. Finally, the results suggested that the capacity for appropriate mind-related comments is more stable than the tendency to use non-attuned mind-related comments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信