文化外交:制度背景

T. Bukina, L. Perminova
{"title":"文化外交:制度背景","authors":"T. Bukina, L. Perminova","doi":"10.30525/2661-5150/2021-4-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the leading types of modern diplomacy. Problem statement. Changes in the system of international relations have led to increased attention to the study of issues related to modern diplomacy. However, in the scientific community, the study of the features and essence of the varieties of modern diplomacy is considered to be fragmented. The lack of thorough general theoretical works on this issue, as well as the frequent misunderstanding of the essence and tasks of modern diplomacy in the scientific and publicist literature, causes confusion and different interpretations of the terms. This points to the relevance and significance of further research in the field of modern diplomacy. The purpose of the study is to reveal the essence and define the terms \" public diplomacy\", \" people' diplomacy\", \"civil diplomacy\", \"new public diplomacy\", to establish their classification according to the subjects of implementation, addressees and peculiarities of practical implementation. The aim of the work is also to conduct a comprehensive analysis of \"cultural diplomacy\" and to identify the main achievements in this area in Ukraine. Methodology. This study uses the methodology of interdisciplinary level science. The interdisciplinary integration of knowledge and the integration of disparate characteristics into a system allowed to obtain new scientific knowledge, which consists in a comparative analysis of the leading types of modern diplomacy, highlighting \"cultural diplomacy\" as the main one and analyzing the main institutional achievements of Ukraine in cultural diplomacy. Results. The article summarizes the definitions of the concepts of \"public diplomacy\", \"civil diplomacy\", \"people's diplomacy\", \"digital diplomacy\", \"new public diplomacy\". Their essential features and main characteristics are highlighted, their comparative analysis is presented, and \"cultural diplomacy\" as the leading direction of modern diplomatic practice is analyzed. The institutional context of cultural diplomacy of Ukraine is considered. The conclusion is made that despite the failure of systemic cultural reforms in the past, today there are positive changes in cultural diplomacy. Ukraine's cultural vector in foreign policy acquires a systemic and strategic balance. Value/originality. A comparative analysis of different types of modern diplomacy is conducted, the definition of \"cultural diplomacy\" is clarified and the peculiarities of its institutional formation are considered. Practical implications. The materials of the article can be used for research and educational purposes, as well as for the further development of the vectors of Ukrainian cultural diplomacy.","PeriodicalId":34091,"journal":{"name":"Three Seas Economic Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CULTURAL DIPLOMACY: INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXTS\",\"authors\":\"T. Bukina, L. Perminova\",\"doi\":\"10.30525/2661-5150/2021-4-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the leading types of modern diplomacy. Problem statement. Changes in the system of international relations have led to increased attention to the study of issues related to modern diplomacy. However, in the scientific community, the study of the features and essence of the varieties of modern diplomacy is considered to be fragmented. The lack of thorough general theoretical works on this issue, as well as the frequent misunderstanding of the essence and tasks of modern diplomacy in the scientific and publicist literature, causes confusion and different interpretations of the terms. This points to the relevance and significance of further research in the field of modern diplomacy. The purpose of the study is to reveal the essence and define the terms \\\" public diplomacy\\\", \\\" people' diplomacy\\\", \\\"civil diplomacy\\\", \\\"new public diplomacy\\\", to establish their classification according to the subjects of implementation, addressees and peculiarities of practical implementation. The aim of the work is also to conduct a comprehensive analysis of \\\"cultural diplomacy\\\" and to identify the main achievements in this area in Ukraine. Methodology. This study uses the methodology of interdisciplinary level science. The interdisciplinary integration of knowledge and the integration of disparate characteristics into a system allowed to obtain new scientific knowledge, which consists in a comparative analysis of the leading types of modern diplomacy, highlighting \\\"cultural diplomacy\\\" as the main one and analyzing the main institutional achievements of Ukraine in cultural diplomacy. Results. The article summarizes the definitions of the concepts of \\\"public diplomacy\\\", \\\"civil diplomacy\\\", \\\"people's diplomacy\\\", \\\"digital diplomacy\\\", \\\"new public diplomacy\\\". Their essential features and main characteristics are highlighted, their comparative analysis is presented, and \\\"cultural diplomacy\\\" as the leading direction of modern diplomatic practice is analyzed. The institutional context of cultural diplomacy of Ukraine is considered. The conclusion is made that despite the failure of systemic cultural reforms in the past, today there are positive changes in cultural diplomacy. Ukraine's cultural vector in foreign policy acquires a systemic and strategic balance. Value/originality. A comparative analysis of different types of modern diplomacy is conducted, the definition of \\\"cultural diplomacy\\\" is clarified and the peculiarities of its institutional formation are considered. Practical implications. The materials of the article can be used for research and educational purposes, as well as for the further development of the vectors of Ukrainian cultural diplomacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Three Seas Economic Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Three Seas Economic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2021-4-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Three Seas Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2021-4-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文分析了现代外交的主要类型。问题陈述。国际关系体系的变化使人们更加注意研究与现代外交有关的问题。然而,在科学界,对各种现代外交的特征和本质的研究被认为是支离破碎的。由于在这一问题上缺乏深入的一般性理论研究,以及科学文献和宣传文献对现代外交的本质和任务的误解,造成了术语的混淆和不同解释。这就指出了在现代外交领域进一步研究的现实意义。研究的目的是揭示“公共外交”、“人民外交”、“民间外交”、“新型公共外交”等概念的本质,对其进行界定,并根据实施的主体、对象和实际实施的特点进行分类。这项工作的目的还在于对“文化外交”进行全面分析,并确定乌克兰在这一领域的主要成就。方法。本研究采用跨学科层次的科学方法。跨学科整合知识,将不同的特征整合成一个系统,从而获得新的科学知识,这包括对现代外交的主要类型进行比较分析,突出“文化外交”为主要类型,并分析乌克兰在文化外交方面的主要制度成就。结果。文章总结了“公共外交”、“民间外交”、“人民外交”、“数字外交”、“新公共外交”等概念的定义。突出二者的本质特征和主要特征,对其进行比较分析,分析“文化外交”作为现代外交实践的主导方向。考虑了乌克兰文化外交的制度背景。结论是,尽管过去的系统性文化改革失败,但今天的文化外交发生了积极的变化。乌克兰外交政策中的文化载体获得了系统和战略平衡。价值/创意。本文对不同类型的现代外交进行了比较分析,澄清了“文化外交”的定义,并思考了其制度形成的特殊性。实际意义。文章的材料可用于研究和教育目的,以及用于进一步发展乌克兰文化外交的载体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CULTURAL DIPLOMACY: INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXTS
The article analyzes the leading types of modern diplomacy. Problem statement. Changes in the system of international relations have led to increased attention to the study of issues related to modern diplomacy. However, in the scientific community, the study of the features and essence of the varieties of modern diplomacy is considered to be fragmented. The lack of thorough general theoretical works on this issue, as well as the frequent misunderstanding of the essence and tasks of modern diplomacy in the scientific and publicist literature, causes confusion and different interpretations of the terms. This points to the relevance and significance of further research in the field of modern diplomacy. The purpose of the study is to reveal the essence and define the terms " public diplomacy", " people' diplomacy", "civil diplomacy", "new public diplomacy", to establish their classification according to the subjects of implementation, addressees and peculiarities of practical implementation. The aim of the work is also to conduct a comprehensive analysis of "cultural diplomacy" and to identify the main achievements in this area in Ukraine. Methodology. This study uses the methodology of interdisciplinary level science. The interdisciplinary integration of knowledge and the integration of disparate characteristics into a system allowed to obtain new scientific knowledge, which consists in a comparative analysis of the leading types of modern diplomacy, highlighting "cultural diplomacy" as the main one and analyzing the main institutional achievements of Ukraine in cultural diplomacy. Results. The article summarizes the definitions of the concepts of "public diplomacy", "civil diplomacy", "people's diplomacy", "digital diplomacy", "new public diplomacy". Their essential features and main characteristics are highlighted, their comparative analysis is presented, and "cultural diplomacy" as the leading direction of modern diplomatic practice is analyzed. The institutional context of cultural diplomacy of Ukraine is considered. The conclusion is made that despite the failure of systemic cultural reforms in the past, today there are positive changes in cultural diplomacy. Ukraine's cultural vector in foreign policy acquires a systemic and strategic balance. Value/originality. A comparative analysis of different types of modern diplomacy is conducted, the definition of "cultural diplomacy" is clarified and the peculiarities of its institutional formation are considered. Practical implications. The materials of the article can be used for research and educational purposes, as well as for the further development of the vectors of Ukrainian cultural diplomacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信