下一代临床心理科学:走向反种族主义

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
C. Rodriguez-Seijas, J. McClendon, D. Wendt, D. Novacek, Tracie I Ebalu, Lauren S. Hallion, Nima Y. Hassan, Kelsey Huson, G. Spielmans, J. Folk, Lauren R. Khazem, Enrique W. Neblett, T. Cunningham, Joya N. Hampton-Anderson, Shari A. Steinman, J. Hamilton, Y. Mekawi
{"title":"下一代临床心理科学:走向反种族主义","authors":"C. Rodriguez-Seijas, J. McClendon, D. Wendt, D. Novacek, Tracie I Ebalu, Lauren S. Hallion, Nima Y. Hassan, Kelsey Huson, G. Spielmans, J. Folk, Lauren R. Khazem, Enrique W. Neblett, T. Cunningham, Joya N. Hampton-Anderson, Shari A. Steinman, J. Hamilton, Y. Mekawi","doi":"10.1177/21677026231156545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of clinical-psychological science exists in a broader field of psychology that is increasingly acknowledged as embedded in racist and white-supremacist history. In the production of clinical-psychological science, the clinical science model predominates as one of the most influential scientific voices that emphasizes the value of rigorous scientific theory, training, and praxis. We highlight some of the ways in which the clinical science model has neglected anti-racism. By examining the idiosyncratic development of the clinical science model in clinical-psychological science, we outline how its failure to contend with systemic racism in the field propagates a racist subdiscipline. Our hope is that by enacting difficult self-reflection, we invite other stakeholders in our field to think more critically about how systemic racism and white supremacy pervade our structures and institutions and to begin making more concrete changes that move the clinical-psychological-science field toward explicit anti-racism.","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Next Generation of Clinical-Psychological Science: Moving Toward Anti-Racism\",\"authors\":\"C. Rodriguez-Seijas, J. McClendon, D. Wendt, D. Novacek, Tracie I Ebalu, Lauren S. Hallion, Nima Y. Hassan, Kelsey Huson, G. Spielmans, J. Folk, Lauren R. Khazem, Enrique W. Neblett, T. Cunningham, Joya N. Hampton-Anderson, Shari A. Steinman, J. Hamilton, Y. Mekawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21677026231156545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The field of clinical-psychological science exists in a broader field of psychology that is increasingly acknowledged as embedded in racist and white-supremacist history. In the production of clinical-psychological science, the clinical science model predominates as one of the most influential scientific voices that emphasizes the value of rigorous scientific theory, training, and praxis. We highlight some of the ways in which the clinical science model has neglected anti-racism. By examining the idiosyncratic development of the clinical science model in clinical-psychological science, we outline how its failure to contend with systemic racism in the field propagates a racist subdiscipline. Our hope is that by enacting difficult self-reflection, we invite other stakeholders in our field to think more critically about how systemic racism and white supremacy pervade our structures and institutions and to begin making more concrete changes that move the clinical-psychological-science field toward explicit anti-racism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychological Science\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026231156545\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026231156545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

临床心理科学领域存在于一个更广泛的心理学领域,这个领域越来越被认为是种族主义和白人至上主义历史的一部分。在临床心理科学的生产中,临床科学模型作为最具影响力的科学声音之一占主导地位,它强调严格的科学理论、训练和实践的价值。我们强调了临床科学模型忽视反种族主义的一些方式。通过研究临床心理科学中临床科学模型的特殊发展,我们概述了它在应对该领域的系统性种族主义方面的失败是如何传播种族主义分支学科的。我们希望通过艰难的自我反思,邀请我们领域的其他利益相关者更批判性地思考系统性种族主义和白人至上主义如何渗透到我们的结构和机构中,并开始做出更具体的改变,将临床-心理-科学领域推向明确的反种族主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Next Generation of Clinical-Psychological Science: Moving Toward Anti-Racism
The field of clinical-psychological science exists in a broader field of psychology that is increasingly acknowledged as embedded in racist and white-supremacist history. In the production of clinical-psychological science, the clinical science model predominates as one of the most influential scientific voices that emphasizes the value of rigorous scientific theory, training, and praxis. We highlight some of the ways in which the clinical science model has neglected anti-racism. By examining the idiosyncratic development of the clinical science model in clinical-psychological science, we outline how its failure to contend with systemic racism in the field propagates a racist subdiscipline. Our hope is that by enacting difficult self-reflection, we invite other stakeholders in our field to think more critically about how systemic racism and white supremacy pervade our structures and institutions and to begin making more concrete changes that move the clinical-psychological-science field toward explicit anti-racism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信