皮质类固醇注射,透明质酸和富含血小板的血浆在骨关节炎:我们在哪里?

Augustin Latourte , Henri Lellouche
{"title":"皮质类固醇注射,透明质酸和富含血小板的血浆在骨关节炎:我们在哪里?","authors":"Augustin Latourte ,&nbsp;Henri Lellouche","doi":"10.1016/j.monrhu.2021.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Because the intra-articular administration of a drug offers many advantages over the systemic route, corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid intra-articular injections are routinely used in the management of osteoarthritis, and recommended in the recent guidelines of the French Society of Rheumatology for the management of knee osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, international guidelines are not unanimous as to their use in the knee, hip or hand osteoarthritis. This discrepancy is explained by the results of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, showing a modest effect size and a disputable clinical relevance. Indeed, clinical trials do not take into account the contextual effect associated with the intra-articular procedure. This effect contributes to the greater placebo effect observed with intra-articular therapies than with oral or transdermal treatments, and the difficulty in demonstrating a clinically relevant effect of intra-articular drugs. Intra-articular injections have an advantageous safety profile compared to other therapies available for the management of osteoarthritis pain. The long-term tolerance of intra-articular corticosteroids remains uncertain, as they have been associated with accelerated structural progression, especially if they are repeated multiple times. Finally, the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma is debated. The literature on this topic is particularly heterogeneous, and randomized controlled trials of good methodological quality are warranted to determine their efficacy and tolerance in the short and long term.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101125,"journal":{"name":"Revue du Rhumatisme Monographies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.monrhu.2021.01.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injections de corticoïdes, acide hyaluronique et plasma riche en plaquettes dans l’arthrose : où en sommes-nous ?\",\"authors\":\"Augustin Latourte ,&nbsp;Henri Lellouche\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.monrhu.2021.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Because the intra-articular administration of a drug offers many advantages over the systemic route, corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid intra-articular injections are routinely used in the management of osteoarthritis, and recommended in the recent guidelines of the French Society of Rheumatology for the management of knee osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, international guidelines are not unanimous as to their use in the knee, hip or hand osteoarthritis. This discrepancy is explained by the results of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, showing a modest effect size and a disputable clinical relevance. Indeed, clinical trials do not take into account the contextual effect associated with the intra-articular procedure. This effect contributes to the greater placebo effect observed with intra-articular therapies than with oral or transdermal treatments, and the difficulty in demonstrating a clinically relevant effect of intra-articular drugs. Intra-articular injections have an advantageous safety profile compared to other therapies available for the management of osteoarthritis pain. The long-term tolerance of intra-articular corticosteroids remains uncertain, as they have been associated with accelerated structural progression, especially if they are repeated multiple times. Finally, the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma is debated. The literature on this topic is particularly heterogeneous, and randomized controlled trials of good methodological quality are warranted to determine their efficacy and tolerance in the short and long term.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue du Rhumatisme Monographies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.monrhu.2021.01.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue du Rhumatisme Monographies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878622721000102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue du Rhumatisme Monographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878622721000102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于关节内给药比全身给药有许多优点,皮质类固醇或透明质酸关节内注射被常规用于骨关节炎的治疗,并且在法国风湿病学会最近的指南中推荐用于膝关节骨关节炎的治疗。然而,国际指导方针对于膝关节、髋关节或手部骨关节炎的使用并不一致。随机对照试验的荟萃分析结果解释了这种差异,显示出适度的效应大小和有争议的临床相关性。事实上,临床试验并没有考虑到与关节内手术相关的环境效应。这一效应导致关节内治疗比口服或透皮治疗观察到更大的安慰剂效应,以及难以证明关节内药物的临床相关效果。与其他治疗骨关节炎疼痛的方法相比,关节内注射具有优势的安全性。关节内皮质类固醇的长期耐受性仍然不确定,因为它们与加速结构进展有关,特别是如果多次重复使用。最后,富血小板血浆的功效存在争议。关于这一主题的文献尤其多样化,需要有良好方法学质量的随机对照试验来确定其短期和长期的疗效和耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Injections de corticoïdes, acide hyaluronique et plasma riche en plaquettes dans l’arthrose : où en sommes-nous ?

Because the intra-articular administration of a drug offers many advantages over the systemic route, corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid intra-articular injections are routinely used in the management of osteoarthritis, and recommended in the recent guidelines of the French Society of Rheumatology for the management of knee osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, international guidelines are not unanimous as to their use in the knee, hip or hand osteoarthritis. This discrepancy is explained by the results of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, showing a modest effect size and a disputable clinical relevance. Indeed, clinical trials do not take into account the contextual effect associated with the intra-articular procedure. This effect contributes to the greater placebo effect observed with intra-articular therapies than with oral or transdermal treatments, and the difficulty in demonstrating a clinically relevant effect of intra-articular drugs. Intra-articular injections have an advantageous safety profile compared to other therapies available for the management of osteoarthritis pain. The long-term tolerance of intra-articular corticosteroids remains uncertain, as they have been associated with accelerated structural progression, especially if they are repeated multiple times. Finally, the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma is debated. The literature on this topic is particularly heterogeneous, and randomized controlled trials of good methodological quality are warranted to determine their efficacy and tolerance in the short and long term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信