法格斯特罗姆尼古丁依赖测试适合候诊室里的每个吸烟者吗

B. Yalcin, M. Unal
{"title":"法格斯特罗姆尼古丁依赖测试适合候诊室里的每个吸烟者吗","authors":"B. Yalcin, M. Unal","doi":"10.5835/JECM.OMU.34.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fagerstrom Nicotine Dependency Test (FNTD) is a vital test in smoking cessation services. It determines the nicotine addiction level of the patients. The test consists of six items, and a smoker can get a score between 1 to 10. A higher score indicates a higher level of dependency. The result of this test is one of the key components that we use to determine and discuss the best possible individualized cessation strategy (life style modifications, motivation interview, nicotine replacement therapy or other drugs) with patients according to evidence-based medicine principles. It is known that FNTD is a very effective tool for primary care and has several advantages over other self / physician-rated tests. However in several cases we have encountered several flaws and problems in each of the six items with extreme or unusual cases in our experiences. Also such problematic cases are not uncommon in our patient population. To our experience clinicians have to question every item of FNTD with special care in order to prevent and misjudge. This condition may be resulted to under- or over-rate dependency levels of the smokers. In this short report we attempt to share and discuss some of these problematic situations and our own experiences.","PeriodicalId":15770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Fagerstrom Nicotine Dependency Test suit every smoker in the waiting room\",\"authors\":\"B. Yalcin, M. Unal\",\"doi\":\"10.5835/JECM.OMU.34.01.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fagerstrom Nicotine Dependency Test (FNTD) is a vital test in smoking cessation services. It determines the nicotine addiction level of the patients. The test consists of six items, and a smoker can get a score between 1 to 10. A higher score indicates a higher level of dependency. The result of this test is one of the key components that we use to determine and discuss the best possible individualized cessation strategy (life style modifications, motivation interview, nicotine replacement therapy or other drugs) with patients according to evidence-based medicine principles. It is known that FNTD is a very effective tool for primary care and has several advantages over other self / physician-rated tests. However in several cases we have encountered several flaws and problems in each of the six items with extreme or unusual cases in our experiences. Also such problematic cases are not uncommon in our patient population. To our experience clinicians have to question every item of FNTD with special care in order to prevent and misjudge. This condition may be resulted to under- or over-rate dependency levels of the smokers. In this short report we attempt to share and discuss some of these problematic situations and our own experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5835/JECM.OMU.34.01.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5835/JECM.OMU.34.01.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Fagerstrom尼古丁依赖测试(FNTD)是戒烟服务的重要测试。它决定了患者的尼古丁成瘾程度。该测试包括六个项目,吸烟者可以得到1到10分之间的分数。分数越高表示依赖程度越高。这项测试的结果是我们根据循证医学原则确定和讨论最佳的个性化戒烟策略(生活方式改变、动机访谈、尼古丁替代疗法或其他药物)的关键组成部分之一。众所周知,FNTD是一种非常有效的初级保健工具,与其他自我/医生评估的测试相比,它有几个优势。然而,在一些情况下,我们在六个项目中遇到了一些缺陷和问题,在我们的经验中出现了极端或不寻常的情况。这样的问题病例在我们的患者群体中并不罕见。根据我们的经验,临床医生必须特别小心地质疑FNTD的每一个项目,以防止和误判。这种情况可能导致吸烟者的依赖程度过低或过高。在这篇简短的报告中,我们试图分享和讨论一些有问题的情况和我们自己的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Fagerstrom Nicotine Dependency Test suit every smoker in the waiting room
Fagerstrom Nicotine Dependency Test (FNTD) is a vital test in smoking cessation services. It determines the nicotine addiction level of the patients. The test consists of six items, and a smoker can get a score between 1 to 10. A higher score indicates a higher level of dependency. The result of this test is one of the key components that we use to determine and discuss the best possible individualized cessation strategy (life style modifications, motivation interview, nicotine replacement therapy or other drugs) with patients according to evidence-based medicine principles. It is known that FNTD is a very effective tool for primary care and has several advantages over other self / physician-rated tests. However in several cases we have encountered several flaws and problems in each of the six items with extreme or unusual cases in our experiences. Also such problematic cases are not uncommon in our patient population. To our experience clinicians have to question every item of FNTD with special care in order to prevent and misjudge. This condition may be resulted to under- or over-rate dependency levels of the smokers. In this short report we attempt to share and discuss some of these problematic situations and our own experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信