艾滋病、爱与法律:从新西兰的《人权法案》到婚姻平等

IF 0.4 3区历史学 Q3 AREA STUDIES

Journal of Australian Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-24 DOI:10.1080/14443058.2022.2090996

Chris Brickell

{"title":"艾滋病、爱与法律:从新西兰的《人权法案》到婚姻平等","authors":"Chris Brickell","doi":"10.1080/14443058.2022.2090996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The terrain of debate over lesbian and gay rights in New Zealand changed markedly between 1993 and 2013. This article compares parliamentary and public discussion of the 1993 amendments to the Human Rights Act, about which very little has been written, and the Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Bill of 2013, to track a range of ideological stances and discursive positions over a 20-year period. Those sceptical about lesbian and gay rights fashioned a changing set of discursive frames that spoke to HIV/AIDS and then the trope of “political correctness”: their arguments, which draw upon a range of international influences, fractured and became more complex as time went on. There has been a shift towards a politics of love since the start of the new millennium, and a rapidly increasing acceptance of the lives of gay and lesbian New Zealanders.","PeriodicalId":51817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Australian Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"339 - 353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AIDS, Love and the Law: From the Human Rights Act to Marriage Equality in New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"Chris Brickell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14443058.2022.2090996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The terrain of debate over lesbian and gay rights in New Zealand changed markedly between 1993 and 2013. This article compares parliamentary and public discussion of the 1993 amendments to the Human Rights Act, about which very little has been written, and the Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Bill of 2013, to track a range of ideological stances and discursive positions over a 20-year period. Those sceptical about lesbian and gay rights fashioned a changing set of discursive frames that spoke to HIV/AIDS and then the trope of “political correctness”: their arguments, which draw upon a range of international influences, fractured and became more complex as time went on. There has been a shift towards a politics of love since the start of the new millennium, and a rapidly increasing acceptance of the lives of gay and lesbian New Zealanders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Australian Studies\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"339 - 353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Australian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2022.2090996\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Australian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2022.2090996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

1993年至2013年间，新西兰关于男女同性恋权利的争论发生了显著变化。本文比较了议会和公众对1993年《人权法》修正案的讨论(关于这一修正案的文章很少)和2013年《婚姻(婚姻定义)修正案》的讨论，以追踪20年来一系列意识形态立场和话语立场。那些对男女同性恋权利持怀疑态度的人塑造了一套不断变化的话语框架，先是谈到艾滋病毒/艾滋病，然后是“政治正确”的修辞:他们的论点利用了一系列国际影响，随着时间的推移，它们变得支离破碎，变得更加复杂。进入新千年以来，人们开始转向爱的政治，对新西兰男女同性恋者生活的接受度也在迅速提高。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

AIDS, Love and the Law: From the Human Rights Act to Marriage Equality in New Zealand

ABSTRACT The terrain of debate over lesbian and gay rights in New Zealand changed markedly between 1993 and 2013. This article compares parliamentary and public discussion of the 1993 amendments to the Human Rights Act, about which very little has been written, and the Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Bill of 2013, to track a range of ideological stances and discursive positions over a 20-year period. Those sceptical about lesbian and gay rights fashioned a changing set of discursive frames that spoke to HIV/AIDS and then the trope of “political correctness”: their arguments, which draw upon a range of international influences, fractured and became more complex as time went on. There has been a shift towards a politics of love since the start of the new millennium, and a rapidly increasing acceptance of the lives of gay and lesbian New Zealanders.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Australian Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Australian Studies (JAS) is the journal of the International Australian Studies Association (InASA). In print since the mid-1970s, in the last few decades JAS has been involved in some of the most important discussion about the past, present and future of Australia. The Journal of Australian Studies is a fully refereed, international quarterly journal which publishes scholarly articles and reviews on Australian culture, society, politics, history and literature. The editorial practice is to promote and include multi- and interdisciplinary work.