在机器中保留一个人以及从部署和维护colander中学到的其他经验教训

Samantha Cheng, C. Augustin
{"title":"在机器中保留一个人以及从部署和维护colander中学到的其他经验教训","authors":"Samantha Cheng, C. Augustin","doi":"10.1080/09332480.2021.1979818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of the “invest in open” movement has led to increased focus on - and recognition of the positive benefit of - open source toolkits as a way of democratizing access to software that is typically expensive and therefore restricted to research institutions. From 2015-2017, DataKind partnered with researchers from NCEAS through the SNAPP Consortium to tackle a problem common across many sectors: how to digest the amount of evidence available for decision-making in a way that would still allow for timely decisions to be made. Realizing that the evidence was stored primarily in PDFs and that the rise of machine learning techniques such as natural language processing meant that thousands of words from PDFs could be processed on local computers, the research team took an approach of building an open source tool to compete with commercially available evidence synthesis tools. With an algorithmic backend that relies on word vectorization, this project is an example of technology use to aid common labor intensive researcher tasks. From inception to early maintenance, this project produced many valuable lessons regarding the launch and stewardship of a public good and this article is a reflection of the learnings across that process.","PeriodicalId":88226,"journal":{"name":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"20 1","pages":"56 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keep a Human in the Machine and Other Lessons Learned from Deploying and Maintaining Colandr\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Cheng, C. Augustin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09332480.2021.1979818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rise of the “invest in open” movement has led to increased focus on - and recognition of the positive benefit of - open source toolkits as a way of democratizing access to software that is typically expensive and therefore restricted to research institutions. From 2015-2017, DataKind partnered with researchers from NCEAS through the SNAPP Consortium to tackle a problem common across many sectors: how to digest the amount of evidence available for decision-making in a way that would still allow for timely decisions to be made. Realizing that the evidence was stored primarily in PDFs and that the rise of machine learning techniques such as natural language processing meant that thousands of words from PDFs could be processed on local computers, the research team took an approach of building an open source tool to compete with commercially available evidence synthesis tools. With an algorithmic backend that relies on word vectorization, this project is an example of technology use to aid common labor intensive researcher tasks. From inception to early maintenance, this project produced many valuable lessons regarding the launch and stewardship of a public good and this article is a reflection of the learnings across that process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chance (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"56 - 60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chance (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2021.1979818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2021.1979818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“投资开放”运动的兴起使人们更加关注开源工具包,并认识到它的积极好处,因为开源工具包是一种使软件大众化的方式,而软件通常是昂贵的,因此仅限于研究机构。从2015年到2017年,DataKind通过SNAPP联盟与NCEAS的研究人员合作,解决了许多行业共同面临的一个问题:如何消化可供决策的大量证据,同时又能及时做出决策。意识到证据主要存储在pdf中,并且机器学习技术(如自然语言处理)的兴起意味着可以在本地计算机上处理pdf中的数千个单词,研究团队采取了构建开源工具的方法,以与商业上可用的证据合成工具竞争。该项目使用基于词向量化的算法后端,是一个使用技术来帮助常见劳动密集型研究人员任务的例子。从开始到早期维护,该项目产生了许多关于公共产品的启动和管理的宝贵经验,本文反映了整个过程中的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Keep a Human in the Machine and Other Lessons Learned from Deploying and Maintaining Colandr
The rise of the “invest in open” movement has led to increased focus on - and recognition of the positive benefit of - open source toolkits as a way of democratizing access to software that is typically expensive and therefore restricted to research institutions. From 2015-2017, DataKind partnered with researchers from NCEAS through the SNAPP Consortium to tackle a problem common across many sectors: how to digest the amount of evidence available for decision-making in a way that would still allow for timely decisions to be made. Realizing that the evidence was stored primarily in PDFs and that the rise of machine learning techniques such as natural language processing meant that thousands of words from PDFs could be processed on local computers, the research team took an approach of building an open source tool to compete with commercially available evidence synthesis tools. With an algorithmic backend that relies on word vectorization, this project is an example of technology use to aid common labor intensive researcher tasks. From inception to early maintenance, this project produced many valuable lessons regarding the launch and stewardship of a public good and this article is a reflection of the learnings across that process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信