读者的招待会比较了Dhia Farah在Twitter应用程序和goodread上的口述和法律小说

Nur Farhanah, P. G. Yanti
{"title":"读者的招待会比较了Dhia Farah在Twitter应用程序和goodread上的口述和法律小说","authors":"Nur Farhanah, P. G. Yanti","doi":"10.24176/kredo.v5i2.7676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article was created to discuss how the reader's reception of the novel Dikta and Hukum by Dhia'an Farah, whose popularity exploded and will be made into a web drama series, and to discuss how the acceptance of this novel is different from 2 different digital social media, both in terms of function and its target users, namely Twitter and Goodreads. This research method uses descriptive qualitative research, with the reception theory from Stuart Hall which divides the reader's reception into 3 types, namely dominant, negotiating, and opposition. This study uses content analysis techniques from data obtained from the Twitter comments column and the Goodreads comment column, which are then entered into a table, then analyzed using table analysis techniques to prove the differences in data from the two applications. This research produces an answer that there are some differences in the reader's reception of the novel Dikta and Hukum from both Twitter and Goodreads social media. This can be seen from how almost all of Twitter's acceptance is dominant, while in Goodreads it is more of a negotiation.","PeriodicalId":34413,"journal":{"name":"Kredo Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perbandingan Resepsi Pembaca Terhadap Novel Dikta dan Hukum Karya Dhia’an Farah Dalam Aplikasi Twitter Dan Goodreads\",\"authors\":\"Nur Farhanah, P. G. Yanti\",\"doi\":\"10.24176/kredo.v5i2.7676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article was created to discuss how the reader's reception of the novel Dikta and Hukum by Dhia'an Farah, whose popularity exploded and will be made into a web drama series, and to discuss how the acceptance of this novel is different from 2 different digital social media, both in terms of function and its target users, namely Twitter and Goodreads. This research method uses descriptive qualitative research, with the reception theory from Stuart Hall which divides the reader's reception into 3 types, namely dominant, negotiating, and opposition. This study uses content analysis techniques from data obtained from the Twitter comments column and the Goodreads comment column, which are then entered into a table, then analyzed using table analysis techniques to prove the differences in data from the two applications. This research produces an answer that there are some differences in the reader's reception of the novel Dikta and Hukum from both Twitter and Goodreads social media. This can be seen from how almost all of Twitter's acceptance is dominant, while in Goodreads it is more of a negotiation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kredo Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kredo Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v5i2.7676\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kredo Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v5i2.7676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的目的是讨论读者对Dhia an Farah的小说《Dikta and Hukum》的接受程度,这部小说的受欢迎程度将被制作成网络剧,并讨论这部小说的接受程度与两种不同的数字社交媒体有什么不同,无论是在功能上还是在目标用户上,即Twitter和Goodreads。本研究方法采用描述性定性研究,采用Stuart Hall的接受理论,将读者的接受分为三种类型,即主导型、协商型和反对型。本研究使用内容分析技术,从Twitter评论栏和Goodreads评论栏获得数据,然后将其输入到一个表格中,然后使用表格分析技术进行分析,以证明来自两个应用程序的数据的差异。这项研究得出了一个答案,即读者在Twitter和Goodreads两种社交媒体上对小说《Dikta and Hukum》的接受程度有所不同。这可以从Twitter几乎所有的接受度都占主导地位的情况中看出,而在Goodreads中,这更多的是一种谈判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perbandingan Resepsi Pembaca Terhadap Novel Dikta dan Hukum Karya Dhia’an Farah Dalam Aplikasi Twitter Dan Goodreads
This article was created to discuss how the reader's reception of the novel Dikta and Hukum by Dhia'an Farah, whose popularity exploded and will be made into a web drama series, and to discuss how the acceptance of this novel is different from 2 different digital social media, both in terms of function and its target users, namely Twitter and Goodreads. This research method uses descriptive qualitative research, with the reception theory from Stuart Hall which divides the reader's reception into 3 types, namely dominant, negotiating, and opposition. This study uses content analysis techniques from data obtained from the Twitter comments column and the Goodreads comment column, which are then entered into a table, then analyzed using table analysis techniques to prove the differences in data from the two applications. This research produces an answer that there are some differences in the reader's reception of the novel Dikta and Hukum from both Twitter and Goodreads social media. This can be seen from how almost all of Twitter's acceptance is dominant, while in Goodreads it is more of a negotiation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信