开放式腹膜前补片与Lichtenstein补片在腹股沟疝修补中的比较研究

Mohamed Hefida, M. Razek, H. Youssef
{"title":"开放式腹膜前补片与Lichtenstein补片在腹股沟疝修补中的比较研究","authors":"Mohamed Hefida, M. Razek, H. Youssef","doi":"10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_57_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background There is still a great debate regarding the optimal approach for inguinal hernial repair. Objective This study aims to compare between the preperitoneal and Lichtenstein approaches in the management of inguinal hernias. Patients and methods We included 50 cases that were randomly divided into two groups: the first group included 25 cases that underwent the preperitoneal repair, whereas the other group included the remaining cases that underwent Lichtenstein repair. Results Intraoperative bleeding was encountered more in the preperitoneal group. Regarding complications, seroma and scrotal edema were encountered more in the Lichtenstein group (P<0.05). Moreover, chronic inguinal pain was more prevalent in the same group. Conclusion Preperitoneal mesh repair offers more advantages over Lichtenstein repair, especially regarding seroma, scrotal edema, and chronic inguinal pain.","PeriodicalId":22975,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study between open preperitoneal mesh and Lichtenstein’s mesh in inguinal hernia repair\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Hefida, M. Razek, H. Youssef\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_57_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background There is still a great debate regarding the optimal approach for inguinal hernial repair. Objective This study aims to compare between the preperitoneal and Lichtenstein approaches in the management of inguinal hernias. Patients and methods We included 50 cases that were randomly divided into two groups: the first group included 25 cases that underwent the preperitoneal repair, whereas the other group included the remaining cases that underwent Lichtenstein repair. Results Intraoperative bleeding was encountered more in the preperitoneal group. Regarding complications, seroma and scrotal edema were encountered more in the Lichtenstein group (P<0.05). Moreover, chronic inguinal pain was more prevalent in the same group. Conclusion Preperitoneal mesh repair offers more advantages over Lichtenstein repair, especially regarding seroma, scrotal edema, and chronic inguinal pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_57_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_57_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景关于腹股沟疝修补的最佳入路仍有很大的争论。目的比较腹膜前入路与利希滕斯坦入路治疗腹股沟疝的疗效。患者和方法我们将50例患者随机分为两组:第一组包括25例行腹膜前修复术的患者,另一组包括其余行利希滕斯坦修复术的患者。结果腹膜前组术中出血较多。并发症方面,利希滕斯坦组血清肿、阴囊水肿发生率高于对照组(P<0.05)。此外,慢性腹股沟疼痛在同一组中更为普遍。结论腹膜前补片修复术优于Lichtenstein修复术,尤其在治疗血肿、阴囊水肿和慢性腹股沟疼痛时效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study between open preperitoneal mesh and Lichtenstein’s mesh in inguinal hernia repair
Background There is still a great debate regarding the optimal approach for inguinal hernial repair. Objective This study aims to compare between the preperitoneal and Lichtenstein approaches in the management of inguinal hernias. Patients and methods We included 50 cases that were randomly divided into two groups: the first group included 25 cases that underwent the preperitoneal repair, whereas the other group included the remaining cases that underwent Lichtenstein repair. Results Intraoperative bleeding was encountered more in the preperitoneal group. Regarding complications, seroma and scrotal edema were encountered more in the Lichtenstein group (P<0.05). Moreover, chronic inguinal pain was more prevalent in the same group. Conclusion Preperitoneal mesh repair offers more advantages over Lichtenstein repair, especially regarding seroma, scrotal edema, and chronic inguinal pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信