从边缘型人格的分类诊断到维度评估

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Current Issues in Personality Psychology Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp.2019.89674

Izabela Huczewska, P. Didyk, R. Rogoza

{"title":"从边缘型人格的分类诊断到维度评估","authors":"Izabela Huczewska, P. Didyk, R. Rogoza","doi":"10.5114/cipp.2019.89674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"participants and procedure For this purpose, we modified an existing measure of borderline personality, the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD), and scrutinized its psychometric properties (i.e., reliability, factorial structure, criterion validity). To assess criterion validity we calculated correlations with pathological personality traits. Our sample comprised 354 participants (67.8% women).","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From categorical diagnosis to dimensional assessment of borderline personality\",\"authors\":\"Izabela Huczewska, P. Didyk, R. Rogoza\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/cipp.2019.89674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"participants and procedure For this purpose, we modified an existing measure of borderline personality, the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD), and scrutinized its psychometric properties (i.e., reliability, factorial structure, criterion validity). To assess criterion validity we calculated correlations with pathological personality traits. Our sample comprised 354 participants (67.8% women).\",\"PeriodicalId\":43067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2019.89674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2019.89674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

为此，我们修改了现有的边缘型人格的测量方法——麦克林边缘型人格障碍筛查仪(MSI-BPD)，并仔细检查了它的心理测量特性(即信度、析因结构、效度)。为了评估标准效度，我们计算了与病态人格特征的相关性。我们的样本包括354名参与者(67.8%为女性)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

From categorical diagnosis to dimensional assessment of borderline personality

participants and procedure For this purpose, we modified an existing measure of borderline personality, the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD), and scrutinized its psychometric properties (i.e., reliability, factorial structure, criterion validity). To assess criterion validity we calculated correlations with pathological personality traits. Our sample comprised 354 participants (67.8% women).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Current Issues in Personality Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

10.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks