从价值敏感设计到价值吸收——建立一种工具来分析价值敏感创新的组织能力

IF 3.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
J. Garst, V. Blok, Léon Jansen, Onno S. W. F. Omta
{"title":"从价值敏感设计到价值吸收——建立一种工具来分析价值敏感创新的组织能力","authors":"J. Garst, V. Blok, Léon Jansen, Onno S. W. F. Omta","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2022.2069994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous Responsible Innovation (RI) research has provided valuable insights on the value con fl icts inherent to societally desirable innovation. By observing the responses of fi rms to these con fl icts, Value-sensitive Absorptive Capacity (VAC) captures the organizational capabilities to become sensitive to these value con fl icts and thus, innovate more responsibly. In this article, we construct a survey instrument to assess VAC, based on previous work by CSR and RI scholars. The construct and concurrent validity of the instrument were tested in an empirical study, including 109 employees of 30 food manufacturing fi rms. The results from the survey were then compared with the conceptual VAC dimensions. With this comparison, we do not only contribute to the substantiation of the VAC construct, but we also show how inductive and deductive approaches can be combined to build theory regarding RI in a transdisciplinary manner.","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Value Sensitive Design to values absorption – building an instrument to analyze organizational capabilities for value-sensitive innovation\",\"authors\":\"J. Garst, V. Blok, Léon Jansen, Onno S. W. F. Omta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23299460.2022.2069994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous Responsible Innovation (RI) research has provided valuable insights on the value con fl icts inherent to societally desirable innovation. By observing the responses of fi rms to these con fl icts, Value-sensitive Absorptive Capacity (VAC) captures the organizational capabilities to become sensitive to these value con fl icts and thus, innovate more responsibly. In this article, we construct a survey instrument to assess VAC, based on previous work by CSR and RI scholars. The construct and concurrent validity of the instrument were tested in an empirical study, including 109 employees of 30 food manufacturing fi rms. The results from the survey were then compared with the conceptual VAC dimensions. With this comparison, we do not only contribute to the substantiation of the VAC construct, but we also show how inductive and deductive approaches can be combined to build theory regarding RI in a transdisciplinary manner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Responsible Innovation\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Responsible Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2069994\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2069994","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

之前的责任创新(RI)研究提供了有价值的见解内在的价值冲突的社会理想的创新。通过观察企业对这些冲突的反应,价值敏感吸收能力(value -sensitive Absorptive Capacity, VAC)抓住了组织对这些价值冲突变得敏感的能力,从而更负责地进行创新。在本文中,我们基于CSR和RI学者之前的工作,构建了一个评估VAC的调查工具。以30家食品制造企业的109名员工为研究对象,对该工具的结构和并发效度进行了实证检验。然后将调查结果与概念VAC维度进行比较。通过这种比较,我们不仅为VAC结构的证实做出了贡献,而且还展示了归纳和演绎方法如何结合起来,以跨学科的方式建立关于RI的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Value Sensitive Design to values absorption – building an instrument to analyze organizational capabilities for value-sensitive innovation
Previous Responsible Innovation (RI) research has provided valuable insights on the value con fl icts inherent to societally desirable innovation. By observing the responses of fi rms to these con fl icts, Value-sensitive Absorptive Capacity (VAC) captures the organizational capabilities to become sensitive to these value con fl icts and thus, innovate more responsibly. In this article, we construct a survey instrument to assess VAC, based on previous work by CSR and RI scholars. The construct and concurrent validity of the instrument were tested in an empirical study, including 109 employees of 30 food manufacturing fi rms. The results from the survey were then compared with the conceptual VAC dimensions. With this comparison, we do not only contribute to the substantiation of the VAC construct, but we also show how inductive and deductive approaches can be combined to build theory regarding RI in a transdisciplinary manner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
20.50%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative assessment and governance of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts and legal scholars, and natural scientists and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation, thus giving further shape to a newly emerging community of research and practice. These approaches include ethics, technology assessment, governance, sustainability, socio-technical integration, and others. JRI intends responsible innovation to be inclusive of such terms as responsible development and sustainable development, and the journal invites comparisons and contrasts among such concepts. While issues of risk and environmental health and safety are relevant, JRI especially encourages attention to the assessment of the broader and more subtle human and social dimensions of innovation—including moral, cultural, political, and religious dimensions, social risk, and sustainability addressed in a systemic fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信