管道对医疗保健中代表性不足的学生入学的影响:一项系统综述

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Nicole Tombers, Joe Bauer, Aaron Boraas, Jordan Lundberg, Rachel Pfeifer, Cassidy Reinartz
{"title":"管道对医疗保健中代表性不足的学生入学的影响:一项系统综述","authors":"Nicole Tombers, Joe Bauer, Aaron Boraas, Jordan Lundberg, Rachel Pfeifer, Cassidy Reinartz","doi":"10.4103/ehp.ehp_29_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of pipelines in increasing enrollment of underrepresented students into graduate healthcare programs. Materials and Methods: Eight databases (CINAHL, Medline, Nursing and Allied Health Premium, OVID, ScienceDirect, Education Index, Proquest, Google Scholar) were searched in October 2021. Inclusion criteria: studies investigating the effect of pipeline programs on enrollment of underrepresented students in individual graduate healthcare programs within the USA. Studies evaluating a pipeline program where students went on to be enrolled at another institution were excluded. Two reviewers screened articles, extracted data and assessed study quality, with a third reviewer resolving disputes. Primary data collected was percentage of underrepresented students enrolled per cohort. Additional data included the profession of the healthcare program, entrance point into the pipeline and interventions used in the pipeline. Study quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for pre/post studies with no control group. Results: After duplicates were removed, 1524 studies were evaluated, with five studies included. Following initiation of a pipeline, fifteen institutions reported increased enrollment of underrepresented students, three reported decreased enrollment, and one reported no change. All studies were of low quality for drawing associative conclusions. Conclusion: Pipelines may be effective at increasing underrepresented students enrolled in graduate healthcare programs. Results are limited in scope, representing only medical and dental programs, and lacking in long-term outcomes.","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":"243 1","pages":"1 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of pipelines on enrollment of underrepresented students in healthcare: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Tombers, Joe Bauer, Aaron Boraas, Jordan Lundberg, Rachel Pfeifer, Cassidy Reinartz\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ehp.ehp_29_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of pipelines in increasing enrollment of underrepresented students into graduate healthcare programs. Materials and Methods: Eight databases (CINAHL, Medline, Nursing and Allied Health Premium, OVID, ScienceDirect, Education Index, Proquest, Google Scholar) were searched in October 2021. Inclusion criteria: studies investigating the effect of pipeline programs on enrollment of underrepresented students in individual graduate healthcare programs within the USA. Studies evaluating a pipeline program where students went on to be enrolled at another institution were excluded. Two reviewers screened articles, extracted data and assessed study quality, with a third reviewer resolving disputes. Primary data collected was percentage of underrepresented students enrolled per cohort. Additional data included the profession of the healthcare program, entrance point into the pipeline and interventions used in the pipeline. Study quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for pre/post studies with no control group. Results: After duplicates were removed, 1524 studies were evaluated, with five studies included. Following initiation of a pipeline, fifteen institutions reported increased enrollment of underrepresented students, three reported decreased enrollment, and one reported no change. All studies were of low quality for drawing associative conclusions. Conclusion: Pipelines may be effective at increasing underrepresented students enrolled in graduate healthcare programs. Results are limited in scope, representing only medical and dental programs, and lacking in long-term outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\"243 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ehp.ehp_29_22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ehp.ehp_29_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:系统评价。目的:评估管道在增加代表性不足的学生进入研究生医疗保健项目的有效性。材料和方法:于2021年10月检索8个数据库(CINAHL、Medline、Nursing and Allied Health Premium、OVID、ScienceDirect、Education Index、Proquest、谷歌Scholar)。纳入标准:研究调查管道项目对美国个别研究生医疗保健项目中代表性不足的学生入学的影响。评估学生进入另一所学校就读的管道项目的研究被排除在外。两名审稿人筛选文章、提取数据并评估研究质量,第三名审稿人解决争议。收集的主要数据是每个队列中代表性不足的学生入学的百分比。其他数据包括医疗保健计划的专业、进入管道的入口点和管道中使用的干预措施。研究质量采用美国国立卫生研究院质量评估工具进行前/后研究,无对照组。结果:剔除重复项后,共评估了1524项研究,其中包括5项研究。在管道启动后,15所大学报告入学人数增加,3所大学报告入学人数减少,1所大学报告没有变化。所有的研究都是低质量的,不能得出相关的结论。结论:管道可能有效地增加未被充分代表的学生进入研究生医疗保健项目。结果范围有限,仅代表医疗和牙科项目,缺乏长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of pipelines on enrollment of underrepresented students in healthcare: A systematic review
Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of pipelines in increasing enrollment of underrepresented students into graduate healthcare programs. Materials and Methods: Eight databases (CINAHL, Medline, Nursing and Allied Health Premium, OVID, ScienceDirect, Education Index, Proquest, Google Scholar) were searched in October 2021. Inclusion criteria: studies investigating the effect of pipeline programs on enrollment of underrepresented students in individual graduate healthcare programs within the USA. Studies evaluating a pipeline program where students went on to be enrolled at another institution were excluded. Two reviewers screened articles, extracted data and assessed study quality, with a third reviewer resolving disputes. Primary data collected was percentage of underrepresented students enrolled per cohort. Additional data included the profession of the healthcare program, entrance point into the pipeline and interventions used in the pipeline. Study quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for pre/post studies with no control group. Results: After duplicates were removed, 1524 studies were evaluated, with five studies included. Following initiation of a pipeline, fifteen institutions reported increased enrollment of underrepresented students, three reported decreased enrollment, and one reported no change. All studies were of low quality for drawing associative conclusions. Conclusion: Pipelines may be effective at increasing underrepresented students enrolled in graduate healthcare programs. Results are limited in scope, representing only medical and dental programs, and lacking in long-term outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信