《歧视的变幻莫测:英国的公交、政策和法律》

D. Kirp
{"title":"《歧视的变幻莫测:英国的公交、政策和法律》","authors":"D. Kirp","doi":"10.1086/443480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between 1950 and the present, Britain acquired a sizable nonwhite population. The proportion of nonwhites-predominantly Indian, Pakistani, West Indian, and West African-rose from seven-tenths of 1 percent to nearly 3 percent. A similar shift is detectable in the school-age population, presently nearly 4 percent nonwhite. Britain's response to this influx of nonwhites is noteworthy for several reasons. Britain has consistently minimized the relevance of race to social policy generally and educational policy specifically; it has also demonstrated a reluctance to treat the issue as having a significant legal dimension. In both respects, Britain chose a policy course at variance with that pursued by the United States, which at least since the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education' has treated racial issues in explicit and primarily constitutional terms. In these respects, busing in Britain (or dispersal, as it is more commonly termed) constitutes an apparent and conspicuous exception to the British policy norm. Busing does treat explicitly with race, for how else is one to determine who is to be bused. The fate of busing also rested, at least for a time, in the hands of the courts, which have otherwise had no say in race and schooling matters; in that sense too, it is exceptional. The evolution of busing policy in Britain has received almost no attention. This disinterest is, in a sense, readily understandable. Only a tiny minority of British nonwhites have ever been bused. The proportion of nonwhites remains relatively small; and, of these, a goodly","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"78 1","pages":"269 - 294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Vagaries of Discrimination: Busing, Policy, and Law in Britain\",\"authors\":\"D. Kirp\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/443480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Between 1950 and the present, Britain acquired a sizable nonwhite population. The proportion of nonwhites-predominantly Indian, Pakistani, West Indian, and West African-rose from seven-tenths of 1 percent to nearly 3 percent. A similar shift is detectable in the school-age population, presently nearly 4 percent nonwhite. Britain's response to this influx of nonwhites is noteworthy for several reasons. Britain has consistently minimized the relevance of race to social policy generally and educational policy specifically; it has also demonstrated a reluctance to treat the issue as having a significant legal dimension. In both respects, Britain chose a policy course at variance with that pursued by the United States, which at least since the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education' has treated racial issues in explicit and primarily constitutional terms. In these respects, busing in Britain (or dispersal, as it is more commonly termed) constitutes an apparent and conspicuous exception to the British policy norm. Busing does treat explicitly with race, for how else is one to determine who is to be bused. The fate of busing also rested, at least for a time, in the hands of the courts, which have otherwise had no say in race and schooling matters; in that sense too, it is exceptional. The evolution of busing policy in Britain has received almost no attention. This disinterest is, in a sense, readily understandable. Only a tiny minority of British nonwhites have ever been bused. The proportion of nonwhites remains relatively small; and, of these, a goodly\",\"PeriodicalId\":83260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The School science review\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"269 - 294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The School science review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/443480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/443480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

从1950年到现在,英国获得了相当数量的非白人人口。非白人——主要是印度人、巴基斯坦人、西印度人和西非人——的比例从0.1%上升到近3%。在学龄人口中也可以发现类似的变化,目前非白人占近4%。英国对非白人移民涌入的反应值得注意,原因如下。英国一贯淡化种族与社会政策、特别是教育政策的相关性;中国还表现出不愿将这一问题视为具有重大法律意义的问题。在这两个方面,英国选择了与美国不同的政策路线,至少自从最高法院在布朗诉教育委员会案中做出裁决以来,美国就明确地、主要地从宪法的角度来处理种族问题。在这些方面,英国的公共汽车(或者更常用的说法是分散)构成了英国政策规范的一个明显的例外。校车确实明确地对待种族问题,否则如何决定谁应该被校车接送呢?校车的命运也至少在一段时间内掌握在法院手中,否则法院在种族和教育问题上没有发言权;从这个意义上讲,它也是例外的。英国公共汽车政策的演变几乎没有受到关注。从某种意义上说,这种冷漠是可以理解的。只有极少数的非白人英国人曾经被校车接送过。非白人的比例仍然相对较小;其中,一个很好的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Vagaries of Discrimination: Busing, Policy, and Law in Britain
Between 1950 and the present, Britain acquired a sizable nonwhite population. The proportion of nonwhites-predominantly Indian, Pakistani, West Indian, and West African-rose from seven-tenths of 1 percent to nearly 3 percent. A similar shift is detectable in the school-age population, presently nearly 4 percent nonwhite. Britain's response to this influx of nonwhites is noteworthy for several reasons. Britain has consistently minimized the relevance of race to social policy generally and educational policy specifically; it has also demonstrated a reluctance to treat the issue as having a significant legal dimension. In both respects, Britain chose a policy course at variance with that pursued by the United States, which at least since the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education' has treated racial issues in explicit and primarily constitutional terms. In these respects, busing in Britain (or dispersal, as it is more commonly termed) constitutes an apparent and conspicuous exception to the British policy norm. Busing does treat explicitly with race, for how else is one to determine who is to be bused. The fate of busing also rested, at least for a time, in the hands of the courts, which have otherwise had no say in race and schooling matters; in that sense too, it is exceptional. The evolution of busing policy in Britain has received almost no attention. This disinterest is, in a sense, readily understandable. Only a tiny minority of British nonwhites have ever been bused. The proportion of nonwhites remains relatively small; and, of these, a goodly
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信