运用基于理论的评估来评估尼泊尔市场系统项目的系统性变化

IF 1 4区经济学 Q2 AREA STUDIES

Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies Pub Date : 2022-02-07 DOI:10.19088/1968-2022.104

Edward Hedley, Gordon Freer

{"title":"运用基于理论的评估来评估尼泊尔市场系统项目的系统性变化","authors":"Edward Hedley, Gordon Freer","doi":"10.19088/1968-2022.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexities of markets and market environments are felt in the design and the evaluation of market systems development (MSD) programmes. The authors reflect on a recent evaluation of an MSD programme in Nepal in which they used contribution analysis as a means of navigating these complexities. The planned niceties of the proposal soon departed ways from the reality on the ground, forcing the authors to adopt a more iterative evaluation approach, while ensuring evaluative robustness. This article outlines the iterative process and what the authors have learned regarding the applicability of contribution analysis within a theory-based evaluation, in a dynamic, changing environment.","PeriodicalId":47532,"journal":{"name":"Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Theory-Based Evaluation to Evaluate Systemic Change in a Market Systems Programme in Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Edward Hedley, Gordon Freer\",\"doi\":\"10.19088/1968-2022.104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The complexities of markets and market environments are felt in the design and the evaluation of market systems development (MSD) programmes. The authors reflect on a recent evaluation of an MSD programme in Nepal in which they used contribution analysis as a means of navigating these complexities. The planned niceties of the proposal soon departed ways from the reality on the ground, forcing the authors to adopt a more iterative evaluation approach, while ensuring evaluative robustness. This article outlines the iterative process and what the authors have learned regarding the applicability of contribution analysis within a theory-based evaluation, in a dynamic, changing environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2022.104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2022.104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

市场和市场环境的复杂性体现在市场系统发展(MSD)计划的设计和评估中。作者反思了最近对尼泊尔MSD项目的评估，其中他们使用贡献分析作为导航这些复杂性的手段。提案的计划细节很快就偏离了实际情况，迫使作者在确保评估稳健性的同时采用更迭代的评估方法。这篇文章概述了迭代过程，以及作者所学到的关于贡献分析在基于理论的评估中的适用性，在一个动态的，不断变化的环境中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Using Theory-Based Evaluation to Evaluate Systemic Change in a Market Systems Programme in Nepal

The complexities of markets and market environments are felt in the design and the evaluation of market systems development (MSD) programmes. The authors reflect on a recent evaluation of an MSD programme in Nepal in which they used contribution analysis as a means of navigating these complexities. The planned niceties of the proposal soon departed ways from the reality on the ground, forcing the authors to adopt a more iterative evaluation approach, while ensuring evaluative robustness. This article outlines the iterative process and what the authors have learned regarding the applicability of contribution analysis within a theory-based evaluation, in a dynamic, changing environment.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The IDS Bulletin is the flagship publication of the Institute of Development Studies, UK, which is a leading global organisation for research, teaching and communications on international development. With its over 40 year history the Bulletin has a unique reputation for intellectually rigorous articles on emerging and evolving development issues presented in an accessible manner, and has become one of the leading journals in its field through engaged scholarship between academic and policy communities in the North and the South. It brings together the latest cutting-edge thinking and research from programmes and events involving the IDS community and presents them to an audience of development practitioners, policymakers and researchers.