施工中有什么特殊用途?

Antun Bilić
{"title":"施工中有什么特殊用途?","authors":"Antun Bilić","doi":"10.5592/ce/senet.2022.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Half a year ago, the Croatian Chamber of Economy and the Croatian Employer’s Association issued the Special Usances in Construction, which regulate the legal relationship between the client (employer) and the contractor. This continues a long tradition of codifying the commercial usages into usances (uzance). It was, however, never sufficiently explored whether the commercial usages can at all be codified. Even if the answer is affirmative, it was not sufficiently explored whether the usances indeed reflect the existing commercial usages. The aim of this research paper is to bridge such gap by analysing the nature of usances and, in particular, the Special Usances in Construction. Several methods are used. First, the textual analysis of the usances. Second, the analysis of jurisprudence. Third, historical method, which explores the origin of usances in former Yugoslavia. The analysis leads to the conclusion that neither earlier usances nor the Special Usances in Construction reflect the existing commercial usages. Instead, they imitate statutory provisions, e.g. by containing the date of the entry into force and even (purportedly) mandatory provisions. Consequently, the Special Usances in Construction have to be qualified as a quasi-legislative instrument. Considering that the legislative power cannot be delegated, unless the parties agree on their application, the Special Usances in Construction cannot be used as a source of law.","PeriodicalId":64912,"journal":{"name":"建设监理","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the Special Usances in Construction?\",\"authors\":\"Antun Bilić\",\"doi\":\"10.5592/ce/senet.2022.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Half a year ago, the Croatian Chamber of Economy and the Croatian Employer’s Association issued the Special Usances in Construction, which regulate the legal relationship between the client (employer) and the contractor. This continues a long tradition of codifying the commercial usages into usances (uzance). It was, however, never sufficiently explored whether the commercial usages can at all be codified. Even if the answer is affirmative, it was not sufficiently explored whether the usances indeed reflect the existing commercial usages. The aim of this research paper is to bridge such gap by analysing the nature of usances and, in particular, the Special Usances in Construction. Several methods are used. First, the textual analysis of the usances. Second, the analysis of jurisprudence. Third, historical method, which explores the origin of usances in former Yugoslavia. The analysis leads to the conclusion that neither earlier usances nor the Special Usances in Construction reflect the existing commercial usages. Instead, they imitate statutory provisions, e.g. by containing the date of the entry into force and even (purportedly) mandatory provisions. Consequently, the Special Usances in Construction have to be qualified as a quasi-legislative instrument. Considering that the legislative power cannot be delegated, unless the parties agree on their application, the Special Usances in Construction cannot be used as a source of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":64912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"建设监理\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"建设监理\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5592/ce/senet.2022.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"建设监理","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5592/ce/senet.2022.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

半年前,克罗地亚经济商会和克罗地亚雇主协会发布了《建筑特别惯例》,其中规定了客户(雇主)和承包商之间的法律关系。这延续了将商业用途编纂成用法(uzance)的悠久传统。然而,对于商业用途是否可以编纂,却从来没有进行过充分的探讨。即使答案是肯定的,也没有充分探讨这些用法是否确实反映了现有的商业用法。本研究论文的目的是通过分析用途的性质,特别是建筑中的特殊用途,来弥合这种差距。使用了几种方法。首先,对用法的文本分析。第二,法理学分析。第三,历史方法,探索前南斯拉夫使用的起源。分析得出结论,早期用法和特殊用法都不能反映现有的商业用法。相反,它们模仿法定规定,例如载有生效日期,甚至(据称)强制性规定。因此,《施工特别须知》必须被限定为一种准立法文书。考虑到立法权不能下放,除非当事人同意其适用,否则不能将建筑特殊用途作为法律渊源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What are the Special Usances in Construction?
Half a year ago, the Croatian Chamber of Economy and the Croatian Employer’s Association issued the Special Usances in Construction, which regulate the legal relationship between the client (employer) and the contractor. This continues a long tradition of codifying the commercial usages into usances (uzance). It was, however, never sufficiently explored whether the commercial usages can at all be codified. Even if the answer is affirmative, it was not sufficiently explored whether the usances indeed reflect the existing commercial usages. The aim of this research paper is to bridge such gap by analysing the nature of usances and, in particular, the Special Usances in Construction. Several methods are used. First, the textual analysis of the usances. Second, the analysis of jurisprudence. Third, historical method, which explores the origin of usances in former Yugoslavia. The analysis leads to the conclusion that neither earlier usances nor the Special Usances in Construction reflect the existing commercial usages. Instead, they imitate statutory provisions, e.g. by containing the date of the entry into force and even (purportedly) mandatory provisions. Consequently, the Special Usances in Construction have to be qualified as a quasi-legislative instrument. Considering that the legislative power cannot be delegated, unless the parties agree on their application, the Special Usances in Construction cannot be used as a source of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8035
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信