企业规模与行业特征背景下的供应商绩效管理

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Martin Pech, D. Vaněček
{"title":"企业规模与行业特征背景下的供应商绩效管理","authors":"Martin Pech, D. Vaněček","doi":"10.12776/qip.v24i1.1407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The paper deals with the differences of supplier performance management characteristics by different size of the enterprises and sectors of industry. Methodology/Approach: The research is based on a questionnaire survey carried out in 2016-2019 in 366 enterprises. Four hypotheses were formulated, focused on supplier selection preferences, frequency of supply evaluation,  providing feedback to the suppliers about their performance and quality control. The results are analyzed by the tests of Chi-square statistics. Findings: The results show that the enterprises differ in the criteria of the selection of the supplier, frequency of supply evaluation and providing feedback to the suppliers about their performance according to their sector industry. In terms of the size of the enterprises, differences were found only in the evaluation of suppliers and evaluation feedback. Enterprises did not differ in quality control of the deliveries. Research Limitation/implication: The results show that quality is the most evaluated criterion in the selection of the suppliers. In the future, the importance of other environmental and Industry 4.0 criteria will grow. It is recommended combining supplier evaluation and reviews with the feedback to the suppliers to improve the performance of the suppliers. Originality/Value of paper: The study compares the enterprises in terms of their size and industries in the area of supplier performance management characteristics. These criteria are often not mentioned nor compared in other publications.","PeriodicalId":44057,"journal":{"name":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","volume":"18 1","pages":"88-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supplier Performance Management in Context of Size and Sector Characteristics of Enterprises\",\"authors\":\"Martin Pech, D. Vaněček\",\"doi\":\"10.12776/qip.v24i1.1407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The paper deals with the differences of supplier performance management characteristics by different size of the enterprises and sectors of industry. Methodology/Approach: The research is based on a questionnaire survey carried out in 2016-2019 in 366 enterprises. Four hypotheses were formulated, focused on supplier selection preferences, frequency of supply evaluation,  providing feedback to the suppliers about their performance and quality control. The results are analyzed by the tests of Chi-square statistics. Findings: The results show that the enterprises differ in the criteria of the selection of the supplier, frequency of supply evaluation and providing feedback to the suppliers about their performance according to their sector industry. In terms of the size of the enterprises, differences were found only in the evaluation of suppliers and evaluation feedback. Enterprises did not differ in quality control of the deliveries. Research Limitation/implication: The results show that quality is the most evaluated criterion in the selection of the suppliers. In the future, the importance of other environmental and Industry 4.0 criteria will grow. It is recommended combining supplier evaluation and reviews with the feedback to the suppliers to improve the performance of the suppliers. Originality/Value of paper: The study compares the enterprises in terms of their size and industries in the area of supplier performance management characteristics. These criteria are often not mentioned nor compared in other publications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"88-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v24i1.1407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v24i1.1407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:研究不同规模企业和不同行业供应商绩效管理特征的差异。方法/方法:本研究基于2016-2019年对366家企业进行的问卷调查。提出了四个假设,重点是供应商选择偏好,供应评估频率,向供应商提供有关其绩效和质量控制的反馈。结果用卡方统计检验进行分析。研究结果表明:企业在选择供应商的标准、评估供应商的频率以及向供应商提供绩效反馈等方面存在差异。在企业规模方面,仅在供应商评价和评价反馈方面存在差异。企业在交货质量控制上没有差异。研究局限/启示:研究结果表明,质量是企业选择供应商时最看重的标准。在未来,其他环境和工业4.0标准的重要性将会增加。建议将对供应商的评价和评审与对供应商的反馈相结合,以提高供应商的绩效。原创性/论文价值:本研究在供应商绩效管理特征方面比较了企业的规模和行业。这些标准在其他出版物中通常没有被提及或比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supplier Performance Management in Context of Size and Sector Characteristics of Enterprises
Purpose: The paper deals with the differences of supplier performance management characteristics by different size of the enterprises and sectors of industry. Methodology/Approach: The research is based on a questionnaire survey carried out in 2016-2019 in 366 enterprises. Four hypotheses were formulated, focused on supplier selection preferences, frequency of supply evaluation,  providing feedback to the suppliers about their performance and quality control. The results are analyzed by the tests of Chi-square statistics. Findings: The results show that the enterprises differ in the criteria of the selection of the supplier, frequency of supply evaluation and providing feedback to the suppliers about their performance according to their sector industry. In terms of the size of the enterprises, differences were found only in the evaluation of suppliers and evaluation feedback. Enterprises did not differ in quality control of the deliveries. Research Limitation/implication: The results show that quality is the most evaluated criterion in the selection of the suppliers. In the future, the importance of other environmental and Industry 4.0 criteria will grow. It is recommended combining supplier evaluation and reviews with the feedback to the suppliers to improve the performance of the suppliers. Originality/Value of paper: The study compares the enterprises in terms of their size and industries in the area of supplier performance management characteristics. These criteria are often not mentioned nor compared in other publications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信