法医鉴定结果模棱两可。

IF 2.3 3区社会学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES

Psychology Public Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-03-13 DOI:10.1037/law0000382

C. Coffey, S. Brodsky, C. Parrott, Andrea Avila

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Equivocal findings in forensic evaluations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Psychology Public Policy and Law Multiple-

CiteScore

3.80

自引率

5.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Psychology, Public Policy, and Law ® provides a forum in which to critically evaluate the contributions of psychology and related disciplines (hereinafter psychology) to public policy and legal issues, and vice versa. It is read by legal scholars and professionals and public policy analysts as well as psychology researchers and practitioners working at the interface of the three fields. The journal publishes theoretical and empirical articles that critically evaluate the contributions and potential contributions of psychology to public policy and legal issues;assess the desirability of different public policy and legal alternatives in light of the scientific knowledge base in psychology;articulate research needs that address public policy and legal issues for which there is currently insufficient theoretical and empirical knowledge;present empirical work that makes a significant contribution to the application of psychological knowledge to public policy or the law; andexamine public policy and legal issues relating to the conduct of psychology and related disciplines (e.g., human subjects, protection policies; informed consent procedures).