脉搏共氧仪在心脏手术中的连续血红蛋白监测。

P. I. Len'kin, A. Smetkin, A. Husseyn, E. Fot, A. I. Len’kin, K. Paromov, A. Ushakov, M. A. Krygina, M. Kirov
{"title":"脉搏共氧仪在心脏手术中的连续血红蛋白监测。","authors":"P. I. Len'kin, A. Smetkin, A. Husseyn, E. Fot, A. I. Len’kin, K. Paromov, A. Ushakov, M. A. Krygina, M. Kirov","doi":"10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-329-334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE AIM\nTo assess the accuracy ofcontinuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry and revealfactors affecting the results of the measurements during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\n27 patients undergoing off-pump CABG and 16patients after elective complex (repair or replacement of two or more valves) or combined (valve and coronary artery) cardiac surgery requiring CPB were enrolled into a prospective observational study. Both groups received continuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry (SpHb). During early postoperative period SpHb was compared with hemoglobin concentration in the arterial blood (Hbart).\n\n\nRESULTS\nWefoundpositive correlation between SpHb and Hb in both groups (rho =0,29, p < 0,05 u rho=0,34; p<0.005 respectively). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias ? limits of agreement (?I.96 SD) between the continuously measured hemoglobin and reference arterial blood hemoglobin concentration of -6,0 ? 41,0 g/l in the off-pump group and 7,7 k 31,0 g/l in the CPB group.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nHemoglobin measurement using pulse co-oximetry does not provide acceptable accuracy during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery. Applicability of this technology is influenced by vascular tone, systemic and regional tissue hypoperfusion.","PeriodicalId":7795,"journal":{"name":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","volume":"34 1","pages":"329-334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[CONTINUOUS HEMOGLOBIN MONITORING USING PULSE CO-OXIMETRY IN CARDIAC SURGERY.]\",\"authors\":\"P. I. Len'kin, A. Smetkin, A. Husseyn, E. Fot, A. I. Len’kin, K. Paromov, A. Ushakov, M. A. Krygina, M. Kirov\",\"doi\":\"10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-329-334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THE AIM\\nTo assess the accuracy ofcontinuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry and revealfactors affecting the results of the measurements during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\n27 patients undergoing off-pump CABG and 16patients after elective complex (repair or replacement of two or more valves) or combined (valve and coronary artery) cardiac surgery requiring CPB were enrolled into a prospective observational study. Both groups received continuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry (SpHb). During early postoperative period SpHb was compared with hemoglobin concentration in the arterial blood (Hbart).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWefoundpositive correlation between SpHb and Hb in both groups (rho =0,29, p < 0,05 u rho=0,34; p<0.005 respectively). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias ? limits of agreement (?I.96 SD) between the continuously measured hemoglobin and reference arterial blood hemoglobin concentration of -6,0 ? 41,0 g/l in the off-pump group and 7,7 k 31,0 g/l in the CPB group.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nHemoglobin measurement using pulse co-oximetry does not provide acceptable accuracy during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery. Applicability of this technology is influenced by vascular tone, systemic and regional tissue hypoperfusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"329-334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-329-334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-329-334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价脉搏共氧仪在心脏手术术后早期连续监测血红蛋白的准确性,揭示影响监测结果的因素。材料与方法27例接受非体外循环CABG的患者和16例接受选择性复杂(修复或更换两个或多个瓣膜)或联合(瓣膜和冠状动脉)心脏手术需要CPB的患者纳入前瞻性观察研究。两组均采用脉搏共氧仪(SpHb)连续监测血红蛋白。术后早期SpHb与动脉血血红蛋白浓度(Hbart)进行比较。结果两组患者SpHb与Hb呈正相关(rho =0,29, p < 0,05; rho=0,34;p < 0.005)。布兰德-奥特曼的分析有偏差吗?协议的限度(I.96)连续测量的血红蛋白与参考动脉血血红蛋白浓度(-6,0 ?停泵组为41,0 g/l, CPB组为7,7 k 31,0 g/l。结论在心脏手术术后早期,用脉搏共氧仪测定血红蛋白的准确性不理想。该技术的适用性受血管张力、全身和局部组织灌注不足的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[CONTINUOUS HEMOGLOBIN MONITORING USING PULSE CO-OXIMETRY IN CARDIAC SURGERY.]
THE AIM To assess the accuracy ofcontinuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry and revealfactors affecting the results of the measurements during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS 27 patients undergoing off-pump CABG and 16patients after elective complex (repair or replacement of two or more valves) or combined (valve and coronary artery) cardiac surgery requiring CPB were enrolled into a prospective observational study. Both groups received continuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry (SpHb). During early postoperative period SpHb was compared with hemoglobin concentration in the arterial blood (Hbart). RESULTS Wefoundpositive correlation between SpHb and Hb in both groups (rho =0,29, p < 0,05 u rho=0,34; p<0.005 respectively). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias ? limits of agreement (?I.96 SD) between the continuously measured hemoglobin and reference arterial blood hemoglobin concentration of -6,0 ? 41,0 g/l in the off-pump group and 7,7 k 31,0 g/l in the CPB group. CONCLUSIONS Hemoglobin measurement using pulse co-oximetry does not provide acceptable accuracy during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery. Applicability of this technology is influenced by vascular tone, systemic and regional tissue hypoperfusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信