关于非联邦司法第一部分宪法(法定)司法是否应该废除俄罗斯联邦主体法院?

M. Kleandrov
{"title":"关于非联邦司法第一部分宪法(法定)司法是否应该废除俄罗斯联邦主体法院?","authors":"M. Kleandrov","doi":"10.31857/s102694520025928-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the first of a series of articles, devoted to the problems of domestic non-federal justice, examines a set of issues related to the constitutional (statutory) courts of the Russian Federation. The author, considering the role and importance of this institution of justice in Russia, the presence of a huge scientific and legal component of its foundation and other factors, as well as the insufficiency of the grounds for its abolition, came to the conclusion that it is necessary to restore it. Taking into account the main drawback of the named institution in the public consciousness – its “high cost” and low “productivity”, the author makes specific proposals to offset this shortcoming when recreating – on a new legislative basis – this institution of domestic justice.","PeriodicalId":82769,"journal":{"name":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"About non-federal justice Part I. Should the constitutional (statutory) ones have been abolished courts of the subjects of the Russian Federation?\",\"authors\":\"M. Kleandrov\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/s102694520025928-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, the first of a series of articles, devoted to the problems of domestic non-federal justice, examines a set of issues related to the constitutional (statutory) courts of the Russian Federation. The author, considering the role and importance of this institution of justice in Russia, the presence of a huge scientific and legal component of its foundation and other factors, as well as the insufficiency of the grounds for its abolition, came to the conclusion that it is necessary to restore it. Taking into account the main drawback of the named institution in the public consciousness – its “high cost” and low “productivity”, the author makes specific proposals to offset this shortcoming when recreating – on a new legislative basis – this institution of domestic justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520025928-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520025928-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,专门讨论国内非联邦司法问题的系列文章的第一篇,审查了与俄罗斯联邦宪法(法定)法院有关的一系列问题。考虑到这一司法机构在俄罗斯的作用和重要性,它的基础中存在着巨大的科学和法律组成部分,以及其他因素,以及废除它的理由不足,作者得出的结论是,必须恢复它。考虑到上述机构在公众意识中的主要缺点- -它的“高成本”和低“生产力”,作者提出了在新的立法基础上重建这一国内司法机构时抵消这一缺点的具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
About non-federal justice Part I. Should the constitutional (statutory) ones have been abolished courts of the subjects of the Russian Federation?
In this article, the first of a series of articles, devoted to the problems of domestic non-federal justice, examines a set of issues related to the constitutional (statutory) courts of the Russian Federation. The author, considering the role and importance of this institution of justice in Russia, the presence of a huge scientific and legal component of its foundation and other factors, as well as the insufficiency of the grounds for its abolition, came to the conclusion that it is necessary to restore it. Taking into account the main drawback of the named institution in the public consciousness – its “high cost” and low “productivity”, the author makes specific proposals to offset this shortcoming when recreating – on a new legislative basis – this institution of domestic justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信