“生态安全”的全球南方视角

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Dhanasree Jayaram
{"title":"“生态安全”的全球南方视角","authors":"Dhanasree Jayaram","doi":"10.1177/2336825X221143624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Ecological Security: Climate Change and the Construction of Security , Matt McDonald delves into a normative analysis of climate security using a framework that has been less explored in security studies – ‘ ecological security ’ . Built on the foundation of environmental security studies – developed over the past two to three decades – this book adopts a counterintuitive approach towards ‘ security ’ in order to carve out a space for consequential discussion on climate change through an ethically framed ‘ ecological security ’ lens. The author ’ s defence of ecological security hinges on several factors: (1) viewing ‘ ecosystems as the referent object of security ’ ; (2) recognizing ‘ the connectivity and interrelationships between human communities and the so-called natural world ’ and (3) acknowledging ‘ the arrival of the Anthropocene ’ (p. 7). The book does not stop at normative discussion, as it also examines the practical implications of the ‘ ecological security ’ framework, as well as the means of achieving it. McDonald speci fi cally focusses on three principles – dialogue, re fl exivity and humility. He however argues: Taken together, these principles also suggest that the function of ecological security is less a program of action than a sensibility that should inform how we make sense of the world and act in it. But it is a sensibility that clearly encourages signi fi cant changes in the way we view the world, existing institutions and practices, and the nature of ethical responsibility (p. 196). In the following review,","PeriodicalId":42556,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A global south perspective on ‘ecological security’\",\"authors\":\"Dhanasree Jayaram\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2336825X221143624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Ecological Security: Climate Change and the Construction of Security , Matt McDonald delves into a normative analysis of climate security using a framework that has been less explored in security studies – ‘ ecological security ’ . Built on the foundation of environmental security studies – developed over the past two to three decades – this book adopts a counterintuitive approach towards ‘ security ’ in order to carve out a space for consequential discussion on climate change through an ethically framed ‘ ecological security ’ lens. The author ’ s defence of ecological security hinges on several factors: (1) viewing ‘ ecosystems as the referent object of security ’ ; (2) recognizing ‘ the connectivity and interrelationships between human communities and the so-called natural world ’ and (3) acknowledging ‘ the arrival of the Anthropocene ’ (p. 7). The book does not stop at normative discussion, as it also examines the practical implications of the ‘ ecological security ’ framework, as well as the means of achieving it. McDonald speci fi cally focusses on three principles – dialogue, re fl exivity and humility. He however argues: Taken together, these principles also suggest that the function of ecological security is less a program of action than a sensibility that should inform how we make sense of the world and act in it. But it is a sensibility that clearly encourages signi fi cant changes in the way we view the world, existing institutions and practices, and the nature of ethical responsibility (p. 196). In the following review,\",\"PeriodicalId\":42556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Perspectives\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X221143624\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X221143624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《生态安全:气候变化与安全的构建》一书中,马特·麦克唐纳使用了一个在安全研究中较少探索的框架——“生态安全”,深入研究了气候安全的规范性分析。这本书建立在过去二三十年发展起来的环境安全研究的基础上,采用了一种违反直觉的“安全”方法,以便通过伦理框架的“生态安全”镜头为气候变化的后续讨论开辟空间。作者对生态安全的辩护基于以下几个因素:(1)将“生态系统视为安全的指涉对象”;(2)认识到“人类社区与所谓的自然世界之间的连通性和相互关系”;(3)承认“人类世的到来”(第7页)。这本书并没有停留在规范的讨论上,因为它还考察了“生态安全”框架的实际含义,以及实现它的手段。麦当劳特别注重三个原则——对话、反思和谦逊。然而,他认为:总的来说,这些原则也表明,生态安全的功能与其说是一个行动计划,不如说是一种感性,它应该告诉我们如何理解世界并在其中采取行动。但是,这种感性显然鼓励我们在看待世界的方式、现有的制度和实践以及道德责任的本质上发生重大的变化。在接下来的回顾中,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A global south perspective on ‘ecological security’
In Ecological Security: Climate Change and the Construction of Security , Matt McDonald delves into a normative analysis of climate security using a framework that has been less explored in security studies – ‘ ecological security ’ . Built on the foundation of environmental security studies – developed over the past two to three decades – this book adopts a counterintuitive approach towards ‘ security ’ in order to carve out a space for consequential discussion on climate change through an ethically framed ‘ ecological security ’ lens. The author ’ s defence of ecological security hinges on several factors: (1) viewing ‘ ecosystems as the referent object of security ’ ; (2) recognizing ‘ the connectivity and interrelationships between human communities and the so-called natural world ’ and (3) acknowledging ‘ the arrival of the Anthropocene ’ (p. 7). The book does not stop at normative discussion, as it also examines the practical implications of the ‘ ecological security ’ framework, as well as the means of achieving it. McDonald speci fi cally focusses on three principles – dialogue, re fl exivity and humility. He however argues: Taken together, these principles also suggest that the function of ecological security is less a program of action than a sensibility that should inform how we make sense of the world and act in it. But it is a sensibility that clearly encourages signi fi cant changes in the way we view the world, existing institutions and practices, and the nature of ethical responsibility (p. 196). In the following review,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Perspectives
New Perspectives POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: New Perspectives is an academic journal that seeks to provide interdisciplinary insight into the politics and international relations of Central and Eastern Europe. New Perspectives is published by the Institute of International Relations Prague.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信