使用建筑解构矩阵对解构建筑进行定量评估

Negar Mohtashami
{"title":"使用建筑解构矩阵对解构建筑进行定量评估","authors":"Negar Mohtashami","doi":"10.1016/j.psrb.2016.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates how deconstruction theory has influenced architectural design in semantic, physical and technical characteristics of buildings and proposes a new assessment tool for measuring key deconstruction criteria in every building. An overview on contemporary architecture styles traces new philosophical notions, such as deconstruction within the theoretical realm. In this study, after a review on deconstruction philosophy, an assessment tool is arranged based on building characteristics and deconstruction criteria. Using this matrix, twenty-three famous deconstruction buildings are evaluated from two perspectives: according to their designers and based on deconstruction criteria. The results indicate that deconstruction criteria are mostly realized in physical characteristics of buildings, rather than semantic or technical characteristics, which has been the primary objective of deconstruction theory in the first place. It is also observed that deconstruction theory has been quite successful in fostering creative thinking and developing personal styles by emphasizing a certain deconstruction criterion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101000,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.11.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative assessment of deconstruction buildings using a Building Deconstruction Matrix\",\"authors\":\"Negar Mohtashami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psrb.2016.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates how deconstruction theory has influenced architectural design in semantic, physical and technical characteristics of buildings and proposes a new assessment tool for measuring key deconstruction criteria in every building. An overview on contemporary architecture styles traces new philosophical notions, such as deconstruction within the theoretical realm. In this study, after a review on deconstruction philosophy, an assessment tool is arranged based on building characteristics and deconstruction criteria. Using this matrix, twenty-three famous deconstruction buildings are evaluated from two perspectives: according to their designers and based on deconstruction criteria. The results indicate that deconstruction criteria are mostly realized in physical characteristics of buildings, rather than semantic or technical characteristics, which has been the primary objective of deconstruction theory in the first place. It is also observed that deconstruction theory has been quite successful in fostering creative thinking and developing personal styles by emphasizing a certain deconstruction criterion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.11.001\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405883116300776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405883116300776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究探讨了解构主义理论对建筑设计的语义、物理和技术特征的影响,并提出了一种新的评估工具来衡量每个建筑的关键解构标准。对当代建筑风格的概述追溯了新的哲学概念,如理论领域内的解构主义。本研究在回顾解构主义哲学的基础上,根据建筑特征和解构标准,安排了一套评估工具。利用这个矩阵,从两个角度对23座著名的解构主义建筑进行了评估:根据他们的设计师和基于解构主义标准。结果表明,解构标准大多是在建筑的物理特征上实现的,而不是语义或技术特征,这是解构理论最初的主要目标。解构主义理论通过强调一定的解构标准,在培养创造性思维和发展个人风格方面取得了相当大的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative assessment of deconstruction buildings using a Building Deconstruction Matrix

This study investigates how deconstruction theory has influenced architectural design in semantic, physical and technical characteristics of buildings and proposes a new assessment tool for measuring key deconstruction criteria in every building. An overview on contemporary architecture styles traces new philosophical notions, such as deconstruction within the theoretical realm. In this study, after a review on deconstruction philosophy, an assessment tool is arranged based on building characteristics and deconstruction criteria. Using this matrix, twenty-three famous deconstruction buildings are evaluated from two perspectives: according to their designers and based on deconstruction criteria. The results indicate that deconstruction criteria are mostly realized in physical characteristics of buildings, rather than semantic or technical characteristics, which has been the primary objective of deconstruction theory in the first place. It is also observed that deconstruction theory has been quite successful in fostering creative thinking and developing personal styles by emphasizing a certain deconstruction criterion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信