超越“战争的血脉”:安全的政治经济学的一个分支

IF 9.7 1区社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Annual Review of Political Science Pub Date : 2019-05-13 DOI:10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-070912

Paul Poast

{"title":"超越“战争的血脉”:安全的政治经济学的一个分支","authors":"Paul Poast","doi":"10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-070912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since at least Cicero, we have known that “money is the sinew of war.” Is it possible for a political economy of security (PES) subfield to contribute knowledge beyond Cicero's claim? This article aims to delineate the boundaries of a PES subfield by using the classic “guns versus butter” trade-off to define the existing literature within the subfield. Thinking seriously about this trade-off, including conditions under which a trade-off may not exist, raises a host of questions. The two most direct questions are: How does consuming “guns” influence the consumption of “butter”? And how does using “guns” influence the consumption of “butter”?","PeriodicalId":48264,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Political Science","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the “Sinew of War”: The Political Economy of Security as a Subfield\",\"authors\":\"Paul Poast\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-070912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since at least Cicero, we have known that “money is the sinew of war.” Is it possible for a political economy of security (PES) subfield to contribute knowledge beyond Cicero's claim? This article aims to delineate the boundaries of a PES subfield by using the classic “guns versus butter” trade-off to define the existing literature within the subfield. Thinking seriously about this trade-off, including conditions under which a trade-off may not exist, raises a host of questions. The two most direct questions are: How does consuming “guns” influence the consumption of “butter”? And how does using “guns” influence the consumption of “butter”?\",\"PeriodicalId\":48264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Political Science\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-070912\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-070912","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

至少从西塞罗开始，我们就知道“金钱是战争的源泉”。政治安全经济学(PES)的分支领域是否有可能贡献出西塞罗主张之外的知识?本文旨在通过使用经典的“枪炮vs黄油”权衡来定义该子领域内的现有文献，从而划定PES子领域的边界。认真思考这种权衡，包括可能不存在权衡的条件，会引发一系列问题。两个最直接的问题是:“枪”的消费如何影响“黄油”的消费?使用“枪”又如何影响“黄油”的消费?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Beyond the “Sinew of War”: The Political Economy of Security as a Subfield

Since at least Cicero, we have known that “money is the sinew of war.” Is it possible for a political economy of security (PES) subfield to contribute knowledge beyond Cicero's claim? This article aims to delineate the boundaries of a PES subfield by using the classic “guns versus butter” trade-off to define the existing literature within the subfield. Thinking seriously about this trade-off, including conditions under which a trade-off may not exist, raises a host of questions. The two most direct questions are: How does consuming “guns” influence the consumption of “butter”? And how does using “guns” influence the consumption of “butter”?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Annual Review of Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

15.20

自引率

4.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Annual Review of Political Science has been published since 1998 to provide comprehensive coverage of critical advancements in the field. It encompasses a wide range of subjects within Political Science, such as political theory and philosophy, international relations, political economy, political behavior, American and comparative politics, public administration and policy, and methodology.