{"title":"哈萨克斯坦青光眼患者生活质量评价(以巴尔喀什为例)","authors":"Saltanat Makhanova, Raushan Sekenova","doi":"10.32921/2225-9929-2021-2-42-52-62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study: analysis and assessment of the quality of life of glaucoma patients in Kazakhstan on the example of Balkhash. Methods. The study was conducted on the basis of the municipal state institution (KSU) \"Polyclinic No. 2\" of the city of Balkhash, Karaganda region in the period from 2019 to 2020. The study involved 46 men and 74 women. The average age of the respondents was ≥64 years. To determine the quality of life of glaucoma patients, we conducted a questionnaire compiled by ourselves and the NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire. The respondents were conditionally divided into three groups: group 1-patients who receive only conservative treatment; group 2 – patients who underwent laser correction in parallel with conservative treatment; group 3-patients who, in addition to previous types of treatment, were operated on. Results. Among the comparison groups, the values of indicators of dependence on the help of others (23.7) and role difficulties (23.9) and social activity (81.6) were significantly lower in patients receiving only conservative treatment. In this group, along with the physical and mental components, it was found that the gap in visual indicators is up to 4 times. Conclusions. The results of the study show that in glaucoma patients receiving only conservative treatment, the quality of life is low compared to the control groups according to all indicators of the scales. A significant impact on the decrease in the quality of life of patients receiving conservative treatment is caused by the discomfort associated with regular use of drugs prescribed for glaucoma and their side effects. Keywords: glaucoma, quality of life, NEI VFQ-256 questionnaire, Kazakhstan.","PeriodicalId":11852,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development","volume":"250 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the Quality of Life of Glaucoma Patients In Kazakhstan (on the Example of Balkhash)\",\"authors\":\"Saltanat Makhanova, Raushan Sekenova\",\"doi\":\"10.32921/2225-9929-2021-2-42-52-62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the study: analysis and assessment of the quality of life of glaucoma patients in Kazakhstan on the example of Balkhash. Methods. The study was conducted on the basis of the municipal state institution (KSU) \\\"Polyclinic No. 2\\\" of the city of Balkhash, Karaganda region in the period from 2019 to 2020. The study involved 46 men and 74 women. The average age of the respondents was ≥64 years. To determine the quality of life of glaucoma patients, we conducted a questionnaire compiled by ourselves and the NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire. The respondents were conditionally divided into three groups: group 1-patients who receive only conservative treatment; group 2 – patients who underwent laser correction in parallel with conservative treatment; group 3-patients who, in addition to previous types of treatment, were operated on. Results. Among the comparison groups, the values of indicators of dependence on the help of others (23.7) and role difficulties (23.9) and social activity (81.6) were significantly lower in patients receiving only conservative treatment. In this group, along with the physical and mental components, it was found that the gap in visual indicators is up to 4 times. Conclusions. The results of the study show that in glaucoma patients receiving only conservative treatment, the quality of life is low compared to the control groups according to all indicators of the scales. A significant impact on the decrease in the quality of life of patients receiving conservative treatment is caused by the discomfort associated with regular use of drugs prescribed for glaucoma and their side effects. Keywords: glaucoma, quality of life, NEI VFQ-256 questionnaire, Kazakhstan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development\",\"volume\":\"250 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32921/2225-9929-2021-2-42-52-62\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32921/2225-9929-2021-2-42-52-62","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of the Quality of Life of Glaucoma Patients In Kazakhstan (on the Example of Balkhash)
The purpose of the study: analysis and assessment of the quality of life of glaucoma patients in Kazakhstan on the example of Balkhash. Methods. The study was conducted on the basis of the municipal state institution (KSU) "Polyclinic No. 2" of the city of Balkhash, Karaganda region in the period from 2019 to 2020. The study involved 46 men and 74 women. The average age of the respondents was ≥64 years. To determine the quality of life of glaucoma patients, we conducted a questionnaire compiled by ourselves and the NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire. The respondents were conditionally divided into three groups: group 1-patients who receive only conservative treatment; group 2 – patients who underwent laser correction in parallel with conservative treatment; group 3-patients who, in addition to previous types of treatment, were operated on. Results. Among the comparison groups, the values of indicators of dependence on the help of others (23.7) and role difficulties (23.9) and social activity (81.6) were significantly lower in patients receiving only conservative treatment. In this group, along with the physical and mental components, it was found that the gap in visual indicators is up to 4 times. Conclusions. The results of the study show that in glaucoma patients receiving only conservative treatment, the quality of life is low compared to the control groups according to all indicators of the scales. A significant impact on the decrease in the quality of life of patients receiving conservative treatment is caused by the discomfort associated with regular use of drugs prescribed for glaucoma and their side effects. Keywords: glaucoma, quality of life, NEI VFQ-256 questionnaire, Kazakhstan.
期刊介绍:
The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development is a multi and interdisciplinary platform that provides space for public health experts in academics, policy and programs to share empirical evidence to contribute to health development agenda.
We publish original research articles, reviews, brief communications and commentaries on public health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to the scholars in the field of public health, social sciences and humanities, health practitioners and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of public health from a wide range of fields: epidemiology, environmental health, health economics, reproductive health, behavioral sciences, nutrition, psychiatry, social pharmacy, medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychology and wide arrays of social sciences and humanities.
The journal publishes the following types of contribution:
1) Peer-reviewed original research articles and critical or analytical reviews in any area of social public health. These papers may be up to 3,500 words excluding abstract, tables, and references. Papers below this limit are preferred.
2) Peer-reviewed short reports of research findings on topical issues or published articles of between 2000 and 4000 words.
3) Brief communications, and commentaries debating on particular areas of focus, and published alongside, selected articles.
4) Special Issues bringing together collections of papers on a particular theme, and usually guest edited.
5) Editorial that flags critical issues of public health debate for policy, program and scientific consumption or further debate