科学与充分理性原则:杜夏·特雷特与沃尔夫

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.1086/723961

Aaron Wells

{"title":"科学与充分理性原则:杜夏·特雷特与沃尔夫","authors":"Aaron Wells","doi":"10.1086/723961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I argue that Émilie Du Châtelet breaks with Christian Wolff regarding the scope and epistemological content of the principle of sufficient reason, despite his influence on her basic ontology and their agreement that the principle of sufficient reason has foundational importance. These differences have decisive consequences for the ways in which Du Châtelet and Wolff conceive of science.","PeriodicalId":42878,"journal":{"name":"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","volume":"37 1","pages":"24 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science and the Principle of Sufficient Reason: Du Châtelet contra Wolff\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Wells\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/723961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I argue that Émilie Du Châtelet breaks with Christian Wolff regarding the scope and epistemological content of the principle of sufficient reason, despite his influence on her basic ontology and their agreement that the principle of sufficient reason has foundational importance. These differences have decisive consequences for the ways in which Du Châtelet and Wolff conceive of science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"24 - 53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/723961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/723961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

我认为Émilie Du chtelet在充分理性原则的范围和认识论内容上与Christian Wolff决裂，尽管他对她的基本本体论有影响，并且他们一致认为充分理性原则具有基础性的重要性。这些差异对杜夏·特雷特和沃尔夫理解科学的方式产生了决定性的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Science and the Principle of Sufficient Reason: Du Châtelet contra Wolff

I argue that Émilie Du Châtelet breaks with Christian Wolff regarding the scope and epistemological content of the principle of sufficient reason, despite his influence on her basic ontology and their agreement that the principle of sufficient reason has foundational importance. These differences have decisive consequences for the ways in which Du Châtelet and Wolff conceive of science.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量