暴政与民主之间:政治流亡者与赫拉克勒·庞蒂卡的历史

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Erga-Logoi Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.7358/erga-2022-001-llod

R. Loddo

{"title":"暴政与民主之间:政治流亡者与赫拉克勒·庞蒂卡的历史","authors":"R. Loddo","doi":"10.7358/erga-2022-001-llod","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the surviving fragments of his treatise On Heraclea the historian Memnon assigns a central role to the exiles from Heraclea. As opponents of tyranny, they represented a destabilising element, a constant danger to the survival of the Clearchid regime. This article explores the events that led to the banishment of the exiles, reconstructs the politics of expulsion implemented by the tyrants, and clarifies the status of the exiles and their political orientation in the light of Memnon’s frequent juxtaposition of the exiles’ demand to return to their homeland and the restoration of democracy.","PeriodicalId":37877,"journal":{"name":"Erga-Logoi","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between Tyranny and Democracy: Political Exiles and the History of Heraclea Pontica\",\"authors\":\"R. Loddo\",\"doi\":\"10.7358/erga-2022-001-llod\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the surviving fragments of his treatise On Heraclea the historian Memnon assigns a central role to the exiles from Heraclea. As opponents of tyranny, they represented a destabilising element, a constant danger to the survival of the Clearchid regime. This article explores the events that led to the banishment of the exiles, reconstructs the politics of expulsion implemented by the tyrants, and clarifies the status of the exiles and their political orientation in the light of Memnon’s frequent juxtaposition of the exiles’ demand to return to their homeland and the restoration of democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Erga-Logoi\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Erga-Logoi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7358/erga-2022-001-llod\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erga-Logoi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/erga-2022-001-llod","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

历史学家门农在他的《赫拉克勒斯论》中幸存下来的片段中，把赫拉克勒斯的流亡者放在了中心位置。作为暴政的反对者，他们代表了一种不稳定因素，对克利亚王朝政权的生存构成了持续的威胁。本文探讨了导致流亡者被驱逐的事件，重构了暴君实施的驱逐政治，并根据门农经常将流亡者回归家园的要求与恢复民主的要求并置，澄清了流亡者的地位及其政治取向。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Between Tyranny and Democracy: Political Exiles and the History of Heraclea Pontica

In the surviving fragments of his treatise On Heraclea the historian Memnon assigns a central role to the exiles from Heraclea. As opponents of tyranny, they represented a destabilising element, a constant danger to the survival of the Clearchid regime. This article explores the events that led to the banishment of the exiles, reconstructs the politics of expulsion implemented by the tyrants, and clarifies the status of the exiles and their political orientation in the light of Memnon’s frequent juxtaposition of the exiles’ demand to return to their homeland and the restoration of democracy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Erga-Logoi Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

14 weeks

期刊介绍： Erga-Logoi is a peer-reviewed open-access journal of ancient history, literature, law and culture, as broadly conceived in geographical and chronological terms. Evoking Thucydides'' methodological exordium (although in that context the opposition obviously has a different value), the name of the Journal was chosen to reflect its intention of looking at the ancient world paying attention to both “facts” (historical events, artistic production, material culture) and “words” (literary, historical, legal production in its oral and written forms). On these bases, the Journal embraces a unified approach to the ancient world, rejecting sectional perspectives for an interdisciplinary focus, reflecting these complex articulated civilizations. The Journal, published every six months, is open to contributions of a historical, philological, literary, archaeological, artistic, and legal nature. It is multilingual, thereby aiming to foster the development of international debate on the ancient world and its legacy.