建筑选址的层次分析法与Topsis法

S. Arslankaya, Ö. Baştürk
{"title":"建筑选址的层次分析法与Topsis法","authors":"S. Arslankaya, Ö. Baştürk","doi":"10.36287/setsci.4.6.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision making is a mental process in which one of the different options is chosen. All decision -mak ng processes end with a decision. In this thesis, site selection for a new project was examined. Investments requiring very high budgets, such as the cons truction sector, need to be made more meticulously. AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and TOPSIS methods were used in decision making process. Expert Choice program was used for AHP analysis. The main criteria were determined during the selection process. T hese criteria were determined by the construction industry experts and individuals (potential customers) by taking into consideration the marital status of the people, their children, their financial situation and their way of liv ing. Criteria have differe nt degrees of importance for people. Therefore, each criterion was compared with the other criteria by weight method. In comparison, we worked very meticulously. Each comparison matrix was examined individually. During the implementation, attention was pai d to the innovations around the candidate construction sites. In this study, site selection was made according to site selection, ra sportation cost, title deeds, cadastre and municipal operations, and preference suggestions were given.","PeriodicalId":6817,"journal":{"name":"4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Engineering and Natural Sciences Proceedings","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytic Hierarchy Process and Topsis Methods of Construction Site Selection\",\"authors\":\"S. Arslankaya, Ö. Baştürk\",\"doi\":\"10.36287/setsci.4.6.067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decision making is a mental process in which one of the different options is chosen. All decision -mak ng processes end with a decision. In this thesis, site selection for a new project was examined. Investments requiring very high budgets, such as the cons truction sector, need to be made more meticulously. AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and TOPSIS methods were used in decision making process. Expert Choice program was used for AHP analysis. The main criteria were determined during the selection process. T hese criteria were determined by the construction industry experts and individuals (potential customers) by taking into consideration the marital status of the people, their children, their financial situation and their way of liv ing. Criteria have differe nt degrees of importance for people. Therefore, each criterion was compared with the other criteria by weight method. In comparison, we worked very meticulously. Each comparison matrix was examined individually. During the implementation, attention was pai d to the innovations around the candidate construction sites. In this study, site selection was made according to site selection, ra sportation cost, title deeds, cadastre and municipal operations, and preference suggestions were given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Engineering and Natural Sciences Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Engineering and Natural Sciences Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.4.6.067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Engineering and Natural Sciences Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.4.6.067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

决策是在不同的选项中选择一个的心理过程。所有的决策过程都以一个决策结束。在本文中,研究了一个新项目的选址。需要非常高预算的投资,例如建筑业,需要更加谨慎地进行。决策过程采用层次分析法和TOPSIS方法。采用专家选择程序进行AHP分析。主要标准是在选拔过程中确定的。这些标准是由建筑行业专家和个人(潜在客户)通过考虑人们的婚姻状况,他们的孩子,他们的经济状况和他们的生活方式来确定的。标准对人们有不同程度的重要性。因此,采用权重法对各指标与其他指标进行比较。相比之下,我们工作得非常细致。每个比较矩阵被单独检查。在实施过程中,重点关注候选施工场地的创新。本研究根据选址、交通成本、地契、地籍、市政运营等因素进行选址,并给出优选建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analytic Hierarchy Process and Topsis Methods of Construction Site Selection
Decision making is a mental process in which one of the different options is chosen. All decision -mak ng processes end with a decision. In this thesis, site selection for a new project was examined. Investments requiring very high budgets, such as the cons truction sector, need to be made more meticulously. AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and TOPSIS methods were used in decision making process. Expert Choice program was used for AHP analysis. The main criteria were determined during the selection process. T hese criteria were determined by the construction industry experts and individuals (potential customers) by taking into consideration the marital status of the people, their children, their financial situation and their way of liv ing. Criteria have differe nt degrees of importance for people. Therefore, each criterion was compared with the other criteria by weight method. In comparison, we worked very meticulously. Each comparison matrix was examined individually. During the implementation, attention was pai d to the innovations around the candidate construction sites. In this study, site selection was made according to site selection, ra sportation cost, title deeds, cadastre and municipal operations, and preference suggestions were given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信