萘普生联合或不联合埃索美拉唑治疗双侧第三磨牙拔牙后疼痛和炎症的疗效:一项双盲交叉研究

G. M. Weckwerth, L. F. Simoneti, P. Zupelari-Gonçalves, A. M. Calvo, D. T. Brozoski, T. Dionísio, E. A. Torres, J. Lauris, F. A. Faria, C. Santos
{"title":"萘普生联合或不联合埃索美拉唑治疗双侧第三磨牙拔牙后疼痛和炎症的疗效:一项双盲交叉研究","authors":"G. M. Weckwerth, L. F. Simoneti, P. Zupelari-Gonçalves, A. M. Calvo, D. T. Brozoski, T. Dionísio, E. A. Torres, J. Lauris, F. A. Faria, C. Santos","doi":"10.4317/medoral.21514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Using a double-blinded randomized crossover design, this study aimed to evaluate acute postoperative pain management, swelling and trismus in 46 volunteers undergoing extractions of the two lower third molars, in similar positions, at two different appointments who consumed a tablet of either NE (naproxen 500 mg + esomepraz ole 20 mg) or only naproxen (500 mg) every 12 hours for 4 days. Material and Methods Parameters were analyzed: self-reported pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS) pre- and postoperative mouth opening; incidence, type and severity of adverse reactions; total quantity consumed of rescue medication; and pre- and postoperative swelling. Results Female volunteers reported significantly more postoperative pain at 1, 1.5, 2, 3 and 4hrs after surgery while also taking their first rescue medication at a time significantly earlier when consuming NE when compared to naproxen (3.7hrs and 6.7hrs). Conversely, no differences were found between each drug group in males. Conclusions In conclusion, throughout the entire study, pain was mild after using either drug in both men and women with pain scores on average well below 40mm (VAS), although in women naproxen improved acute postoperative pain management when compared to NE. Key words:Oral surgery, third molar, pain, naproxen, esomeprazole, NSAIDs.","PeriodicalId":18367,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","volume":"8 1","pages":"e122 - e131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of naproxen with or without esomeprazole for pain and inflammation in patients after bilateral third molar extractions: A double blinded crossover study\",\"authors\":\"G. M. Weckwerth, L. F. Simoneti, P. Zupelari-Gonçalves, A. M. Calvo, D. T. Brozoski, T. Dionísio, E. A. Torres, J. Lauris, F. A. Faria, C. Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/medoral.21514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Using a double-blinded randomized crossover design, this study aimed to evaluate acute postoperative pain management, swelling and trismus in 46 volunteers undergoing extractions of the two lower third molars, in similar positions, at two different appointments who consumed a tablet of either NE (naproxen 500 mg + esomepraz ole 20 mg) or only naproxen (500 mg) every 12 hours for 4 days. Material and Methods Parameters were analyzed: self-reported pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS) pre- and postoperative mouth opening; incidence, type and severity of adverse reactions; total quantity consumed of rescue medication; and pre- and postoperative swelling. Results Female volunteers reported significantly more postoperative pain at 1, 1.5, 2, 3 and 4hrs after surgery while also taking their first rescue medication at a time significantly earlier when consuming NE when compared to naproxen (3.7hrs and 6.7hrs). Conversely, no differences were found between each drug group in males. Conclusions In conclusion, throughout the entire study, pain was mild after using either drug in both men and women with pain scores on average well below 40mm (VAS), although in women naproxen improved acute postoperative pain management when compared to NE. Key words:Oral surgery, third molar, pain, naproxen, esomeprazole, NSAIDs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"e122 - e131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本研究采用双盲随机交叉设计,旨在评估46名志愿者的急性术后疼痛管理、肿胀和牙关,这些志愿者在两个不同的时间,在相似的位置拔除两颗下三磨牙,每12小时服用一片NE(萘普生500 mg +埃索美拉唑20 mg)或仅服用萘普生500 mg,持续4天。材料和方法对参数进行分析:采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行术前和术后自我报告疼痛强度;不良反应的发生率、类型和严重程度;抢救用药总消耗量;以及术前和术后肿胀。结果女性志愿者在术后1、1.5、2、3和4小时报告了更多的术后疼痛,同时与服用萘普生(3.7小时和6.7小时)相比,服用NE的女性志愿者在更早的时间服用了第一次抢救药物。相反,在男性中,每个药物组之间没有发现差异。总而言之,在整个研究中,无论男性还是女性,在使用任何一种药物后疼痛都是轻微的,疼痛评分平均远低于40mm (VAS),尽管在女性中,与NE相比,萘普生改善了急性术后疼痛管理。关键词:口腔外科,第三磨牙,疼痛,萘普生,埃索美拉唑,非甾体抗炎药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of naproxen with or without esomeprazole for pain and inflammation in patients after bilateral third molar extractions: A double blinded crossover study
Background Using a double-blinded randomized crossover design, this study aimed to evaluate acute postoperative pain management, swelling and trismus in 46 volunteers undergoing extractions of the two lower third molars, in similar positions, at two different appointments who consumed a tablet of either NE (naproxen 500 mg + esomepraz ole 20 mg) or only naproxen (500 mg) every 12 hours for 4 days. Material and Methods Parameters were analyzed: self-reported pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS) pre- and postoperative mouth opening; incidence, type and severity of adverse reactions; total quantity consumed of rescue medication; and pre- and postoperative swelling. Results Female volunteers reported significantly more postoperative pain at 1, 1.5, 2, 3 and 4hrs after surgery while also taking their first rescue medication at a time significantly earlier when consuming NE when compared to naproxen (3.7hrs and 6.7hrs). Conversely, no differences were found between each drug group in males. Conclusions In conclusion, throughout the entire study, pain was mild after using either drug in both men and women with pain scores on average well below 40mm (VAS), although in women naproxen improved acute postoperative pain management when compared to NE. Key words:Oral surgery, third molar, pain, naproxen, esomeprazole, NSAIDs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信