可持续发展报告作为公司esg原则政策反映的背景特征

Q2 Social Sciences
T. Goroshnikova
{"title":"可持续发展报告作为公司esg原则政策反映的背景特征","authors":"T. Goroshnikova","doi":"10.26794/2304-022x-2022-12-3-70-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainability reports allow checking the company’s proper understanding of the concept of “sustainability” in the context of its activities. The article shows the problems and features of the sustainability reports language as part of the company’s corporate reporting. The purpose of article is to review the linguistic methods of evaluation of sustainability reports to obtain summaries on corporate transparency of companies (absence of “greenwashing”), and its task is to interpretation texts through analysis using these tools. Linguistic methods of evaluation of sustainability reports, reviewed by author, provide an opportunity to test intuitive assumptions about the availability of marketing information or data on innovation positioning, and that there is a difference between the texts of the reports of organizations that disclose information and those that issue those documents for other purposes. Based on the analysis, the need to create rules for the interpretation of results related to linguistic features and extracted from sustainability reports when using natural language processing methods was summarized.","PeriodicalId":35958,"journal":{"name":"Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Features of context the sustainable development report as a reflection of company policy for ESG-principles\",\"authors\":\"T. Goroshnikova\",\"doi\":\"10.26794/2304-022x-2022-12-3-70-81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sustainability reports allow checking the company’s proper understanding of the concept of “sustainability” in the context of its activities. The article shows the problems and features of the sustainability reports language as part of the company’s corporate reporting. The purpose of article is to review the linguistic methods of evaluation of sustainability reports to obtain summaries on corporate transparency of companies (absence of “greenwashing”), and its task is to interpretation texts through analysis using these tools. Linguistic methods of evaluation of sustainability reports, reviewed by author, provide an opportunity to test intuitive assumptions about the availability of marketing information or data on innovation positioning, and that there is a difference between the texts of the reports of organizations that disclose information and those that issue those documents for other purposes. Based on the analysis, the need to create rules for the interpretation of results related to linguistic features and extracted from sustainability reports when using natural language processing methods was summarized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022x-2022-12-3-70-81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022x-2022-12-3-70-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续发展报告可以检查公司在其活动背景下对“可持续发展”概念的正确理解。文章分析了可持续发展报告语言作为公司报告的一部分存在的问题和特点。本文的目的是回顾评估可持续发展报告的语言方法,以获得公司公司透明度的摘要(不存在“漂绿”),其任务是通过使用这些工具进行分析来解释文本。作者审查的评价可持续发展报告的语言方法提供了一个机会来检验关于营销信息或创新定位数据的可用性的直觉假设,以及披露信息的组织的报告文本与为其他目的发布这些文件的组织的报告文本之间存在差异。在此基础上,总结了在使用自然语言处理方法时,需要为可持续发展报告中提取的语言特征相关结果创建解释规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Features of context the sustainable development report as a reflection of company policy for ESG-principles
Sustainability reports allow checking the company’s proper understanding of the concept of “sustainability” in the context of its activities. The article shows the problems and features of the sustainability reports language as part of the company’s corporate reporting. The purpose of article is to review the linguistic methods of evaluation of sustainability reports to obtain summaries on corporate transparency of companies (absence of “greenwashing”), and its task is to interpretation texts through analysis using these tools. Linguistic methods of evaluation of sustainability reports, reviewed by author, provide an opportunity to test intuitive assumptions about the availability of marketing information or data on innovation positioning, and that there is a difference between the texts of the reports of organizations that disclose information and those that issue those documents for other purposes. Based on the analysis, the need to create rules for the interpretation of results related to linguistic features and extracted from sustainability reports when using natural language processing methods was summarized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences
Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信