{"title":"以证据为基础的意见?:美国顶尖法学家在刑事诉讼判决中使用社会科学方面的差异","authors":"Michele Bisaccia Meitl","doi":"10.1080/03623319.2020.1806582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of social science research in reaching a judicial decision with broad societal implications dovetails with the emerging push for evidence-based policies regarding criminal procedure issues....","PeriodicalId":51477,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based opinions?: How the top jurists in the United States differ in their use of social science in criminal procedure decisions\",\"authors\":\"Michele Bisaccia Meitl\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03623319.2020.1806582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of social science research in reaching a judicial decision with broad societal implications dovetails with the emerging push for evidence-based policies regarding criminal procedure issues....\",\"PeriodicalId\":51477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science Journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1806582\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1806582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evidence-based opinions?: How the top jurists in the United States differ in their use of social science in criminal procedure decisions
The use of social science research in reaching a judicial decision with broad societal implications dovetails with the emerging push for evidence-based policies regarding criminal procedure issues....
期刊介绍:
The Social Science Journal is the official journal of the Western Social Science Association. The principal purpose of the journal is to publish scholarly work in the social sciences defined in the classical sense, that is in the social sciences, the humanities, and the natural sciences. The research that is published may take a theoretical or speculative model as well as statistical and mathematical. Contributions are welcome from all fields which have relevant and insightful comments to make about the social sciences. The journal also includes a Research Note section which is devoted to supporting scholarly research that is in progress. The journal has a well-established book review section which reflects the academic and intellectual diversity within the WSSA.