并购战略管理研究三十年:引文、共同引文和主题

Manuel Portugal Ferreira , Nuno Rosa dos Reis , Cláudia Frias Pinto
{"title":"并购战略管理研究三十年:引文、共同引文和主题","authors":"Manuel Portugal Ferreira ,&nbsp;Nuno Rosa dos Reis ,&nbsp;Cláudia Frias Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Merger and acquisitions (M&amp;As) strategies have been growingly deployed by firms for their domestic and international expansion, in order to redefine their business scope or take advantage of emerging opportunities. In this paper we conduct a bibliometric study of the extant strategy research on M&amp;As, assessed by the articles published in the main journal for strategic management studies over the period 1984–2010. Results reveal the highest impact works (articles and books), the intellectual ties among authors and theories that form five main clusters of research, and the topics delved into. Performance effects, M&amp;As as diversification strategies, and resource- and capabilities-based topics have dominated the extant research. The study contributes to the existing knowledge on M&amp;As by taking stock of the accumulated knowledge and research direction, complementing other literature reviews with a strategic management perspective. Thus, we provide a rear view of the field, which facilitates detecting untapped gaps that may provide generous avenues for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100585,"journal":{"name":"Global Economics and Management Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"Pages 13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.12.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three decades of strategic management research on M&As: Citations, co-citations, and topics\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Portugal Ferreira ,&nbsp;Nuno Rosa dos Reis ,&nbsp;Cláudia Frias Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Merger and acquisitions (M&amp;As) strategies have been growingly deployed by firms for their domestic and international expansion, in order to redefine their business scope or take advantage of emerging opportunities. In this paper we conduct a bibliometric study of the extant strategy research on M&amp;As, assessed by the articles published in the main journal for strategic management studies over the period 1984–2010. Results reveal the highest impact works (articles and books), the intellectual ties among authors and theories that form five main clusters of research, and the topics delved into. Performance effects, M&amp;As as diversification strategies, and resource- and capabilities-based topics have dominated the extant research. The study contributes to the existing knowledge on M&amp;As by taking stock of the accumulated knowledge and research direction, complementing other literature reviews with a strategic management perspective. Thus, we provide a rear view of the field, which facilitates detecting untapped gaps that may provide generous avenues for future research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Economics and Management Review\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 13-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gemrev.2015.12.002\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Economics and Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340154016300020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Economics and Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340154016300020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

并购(M&As)战略越来越多地被公司用于国内和国际扩张,以重新定义其业务范围或利用新出现的机会。在本文中,我们对现有的M&As战略研究进行了文献计量学研究,并对1984-2010年期间发表在战略管理研究主要期刊上的文章进行了评估。结果显示了最具影响力的作品(文章和书籍),作者和理论之间的智力联系,形成了五个主要的研究集群,以及深入研究的主题。现有的研究主要集中在绩效效应、管理、多元化战略和资源能力等方面。本研究对现有的管理管理知识有贡献,对积累的知识和研究方向进行了总结,并以战略管理的视角对其他文献综述进行了补充。因此,我们提供了该领域的后视图,这有助于发现未开发的空白,这可能为未来的研究提供慷慨的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three decades of strategic management research on M&As: Citations, co-citations, and topics

Merger and acquisitions (M&As) strategies have been growingly deployed by firms for their domestic and international expansion, in order to redefine their business scope or take advantage of emerging opportunities. In this paper we conduct a bibliometric study of the extant strategy research on M&As, assessed by the articles published in the main journal for strategic management studies over the period 1984–2010. Results reveal the highest impact works (articles and books), the intellectual ties among authors and theories that form five main clusters of research, and the topics delved into. Performance effects, M&As as diversification strategies, and resource- and capabilities-based topics have dominated the extant research. The study contributes to the existing knowledge on M&As by taking stock of the accumulated knowledge and research direction, complementing other literature reviews with a strategic management perspective. Thus, we provide a rear view of the field, which facilitates detecting untapped gaps that may provide generous avenues for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信