现实检验2:冠状病毒、传染病和经济心身《两只虫子的故事

Patrick Schotanus
{"title":"现实检验2:冠状病毒、传染病和经济心身《两只虫子的故事","authors":"Patrick Schotanus","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3567796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The coronavirus did not cause the weakness of the economy but painfully exposed it. The ‘underlying condition’ which made our collective economic mind-body so vulnerable was caused by another virus. This one isn’t a pathogen but a mental bug in the form of the mechanical worldview that infected mainstream economics many years ago. It basically views the economy as a machine, the market as an automaton, and humans as robots. What this ignores is the fact that humans have conscious minds which, via trading and technologies, extend into real and financial markets. Problems thus start when such a view is turned into practice via mechanical policies, regulations and strategies. Specifically, they interfere with the chain of (e.g. price) discovery that sustains the economic system for the benefit of society. Such discovery relies on conscious minds. Crucially, there is nothing mechanical about consciousness or discovery. In fact, treating (extended) conscious minds in a mechanical way is very damaging. It goes against their nature and at some point this leads to reality checks. Reality checks are ontological, and sometimes also existential. In 2008 we experienced our first. This paper argues to make this our last by curing economics’ paradigm.","PeriodicalId":13563,"journal":{"name":"Insurance & Financing in Health Economics eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reality Check 2: Corona, Contagion, and the Economic Mind-Body; A Story of Two Bugs\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Schotanus\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3567796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The coronavirus did not cause the weakness of the economy but painfully exposed it. The ‘underlying condition’ which made our collective economic mind-body so vulnerable was caused by another virus. This one isn’t a pathogen but a mental bug in the form of the mechanical worldview that infected mainstream economics many years ago. It basically views the economy as a machine, the market as an automaton, and humans as robots. What this ignores is the fact that humans have conscious minds which, via trading and technologies, extend into real and financial markets. Problems thus start when such a view is turned into practice via mechanical policies, regulations and strategies. Specifically, they interfere with the chain of (e.g. price) discovery that sustains the economic system for the benefit of society. Such discovery relies on conscious minds. Crucially, there is nothing mechanical about consciousness or discovery. In fact, treating (extended) conscious minds in a mechanical way is very damaging. It goes against their nature and at some point this leads to reality checks. Reality checks are ontological, and sometimes also existential. In 2008 we experienced our first. This paper argues to make this our last by curing economics’ paradigm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insurance & Financing in Health Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insurance & Financing in Health Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3567796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance & Financing in Health Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3567796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

冠状病毒并没有导致经济疲软,但却痛苦地暴露了经济疲软。使我们的集体经济身心如此脆弱的“潜在条件”是由另一种病毒引起的。这不是一种病原体,而是一种多年前感染主流经济学的机械世界观形式的精神缺陷。它基本上将经济视为一台机器,将市场视为一台自动机,将人类视为机器人。这忽略了一个事实,即人类有有意识的思维,通过交易和技术,这些思维延伸到了现实和金融市场。因此,当这种观点通过机械的政策、法规和战略变成实践时,问题就开始了。具体来说,它们干扰了为了社会利益而维持经济体系的发现链(如价格)。这种发现依赖于有意识的思维。至关重要的是,意识或发现并不是机械的。事实上,以机械的方式对待(扩展的)意识思维是非常有害的。这违背了他们的本性,在某种程度上,这导致了现实的检验。现实检查是本体论的,有时也是存在主义的。2008年,我们经历了第一次。本文主张通过固化经济学的范式,使之成为我们的最后一个。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reality Check 2: Corona, Contagion, and the Economic Mind-Body; A Story of Two Bugs
The coronavirus did not cause the weakness of the economy but painfully exposed it. The ‘underlying condition’ which made our collective economic mind-body so vulnerable was caused by another virus. This one isn’t a pathogen but a mental bug in the form of the mechanical worldview that infected mainstream economics many years ago. It basically views the economy as a machine, the market as an automaton, and humans as robots. What this ignores is the fact that humans have conscious minds which, via trading and technologies, extend into real and financial markets. Problems thus start when such a view is turned into practice via mechanical policies, regulations and strategies. Specifically, they interfere with the chain of (e.g. price) discovery that sustains the economic system for the benefit of society. Such discovery relies on conscious minds. Crucially, there is nothing mechanical about consciousness or discovery. In fact, treating (extended) conscious minds in a mechanical way is very damaging. It goes against their nature and at some point this leads to reality checks. Reality checks are ontological, and sometimes also existential. In 2008 we experienced our first. This paper argues to make this our last by curing economics’ paradigm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信