1968年——叛逆一年的共鸣记忆

Q2 Social Sciences
Donatella della Porta
{"title":"1968年——叛逆一年的共鸣记忆","authors":"Donatella della Porta","doi":"10.3167/cont.2018.060202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The year 1968 has been considered a historical moment\nin the study of protest. What is celebrated on its fiftieth anniversary,\nas for any historical event, is a particularly specific vision\nof that year. This article bridges social movement studies with\nmemory studies, arguing that social movement studies should give\nmore attention to how movement events are remembered by subsequent\nmovements. I argue that the memory of 1968 has proven to\nbe selective, contested, and changeable over time. I suggest that, as\nmemories of democratic transitions intertwined with anti-austerity\nprotests, the memories of 1968’s rebellious year acquire a central\nrelevance in times of quick transformation, in which old identities\nand relations are unsettled and new ones emerge. I explore\nthis through a discussion of current debates on memory distortion,\ncontestation, and fluidity.","PeriodicalId":36466,"journal":{"name":"Contention","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1968 – The Resonant Memory of a Rebellious Year\",\"authors\":\"Donatella della Porta\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/cont.2018.060202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The year 1968 has been considered a historical moment\\nin the study of protest. What is celebrated on its fiftieth anniversary,\\nas for any historical event, is a particularly specific vision\\nof that year. This article bridges social movement studies with\\nmemory studies, arguing that social movement studies should give\\nmore attention to how movement events are remembered by subsequent\\nmovements. I argue that the memory of 1968 has proven to\\nbe selective, contested, and changeable over time. I suggest that, as\\nmemories of democratic transitions intertwined with anti-austerity\\nprotests, the memories of 1968’s rebellious year acquire a central\\nrelevance in times of quick transformation, in which old identities\\nand relations are unsettled and new ones emerge. I explore\\nthis through a discussion of current debates on memory distortion,\\ncontestation, and fluidity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contention\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/cont.2018.060202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/cont.2018.060202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1968年被认为是抗议研究的一个历史性时刻。与任何历史事件一样,在五十周年纪念时庆祝的是对那一年的特别具体的展望。本文将社会运动研究与记忆研究联系起来,认为社会运动研究应该更多地关注运动事件如何被随后的运动记住。我认为,1968年的记忆已被证明是选择性的、有争议的和随时间变化的。我认为,正如民主转型的记忆与反紧缩抗议交织在一起一样,1968年叛逆之年的记忆在快速转型的时代获得了核心相关性,在这个时代,旧的身份和关系不稳定,新的身份和关系出现。我通过讨论当前关于记忆扭曲、争论和流动性的争论来探讨这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
1968 – The Resonant Memory of a Rebellious Year
The year 1968 has been considered a historical moment in the study of protest. What is celebrated on its fiftieth anniversary, as for any historical event, is a particularly specific vision of that year. This article bridges social movement studies with memory studies, arguing that social movement studies should give more attention to how movement events are remembered by subsequent movements. I argue that the memory of 1968 has proven to be selective, contested, and changeable over time. I suggest that, as memories of democratic transitions intertwined with anti-austerity protests, the memories of 1968’s rebellious year acquire a central relevance in times of quick transformation, in which old identities and relations are unsettled and new ones emerge. I explore this through a discussion of current debates on memory distortion, contestation, and fluidity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contention
Contention Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信