建立确定遗产树状态的一致标准

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Myles Ritchie, B. Szuster, Andrew Kaufman
{"title":"建立确定遗产树状态的一致标准","authors":"Myles Ritchie, B. Szuster, Andrew Kaufman","doi":"10.1080/03071375.2020.1814655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Heritage trees are identified and valued based on important historical, cultural and physical criteria that these specimens possess. This research attempts to support heritage tree programmes by identifying a standardised set of expert-verified criteria that can be applied regardless of geographic location. An initial set of 40 criteria were derived from an analysis of 46 case studies and presented to a panel of heritage tree experts to obtain consensus on the core criteria that should be used by any heritage tree programme. A three iteration Delphi method was used to evaluate the criteria and allowed additional content to be generated by the panel. The result saw 50 criteria analysed to produce a set of 16 consensus core criteria and an additional 29 situational criteria that can apply on a case-by-case basis. This study identified the existence of 16 common values shared among these tree programmes and serves as an initial template for use by current and proposed heritage tree programmes to select ideal candidates. Through this standardised evaluation system, the current patchwork of heritage tree programmes now has the potential to become a unified network leading to the increased awareness and protection of these trees.","PeriodicalId":35799,"journal":{"name":"Arboricultural Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"73 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing consensus criteria for determining heritage tree status\",\"authors\":\"Myles Ritchie, B. Szuster, Andrew Kaufman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03071375.2020.1814655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Heritage trees are identified and valued based on important historical, cultural and physical criteria that these specimens possess. This research attempts to support heritage tree programmes by identifying a standardised set of expert-verified criteria that can be applied regardless of geographic location. An initial set of 40 criteria were derived from an analysis of 46 case studies and presented to a panel of heritage tree experts to obtain consensus on the core criteria that should be used by any heritage tree programme. A three iteration Delphi method was used to evaluate the criteria and allowed additional content to be generated by the panel. The result saw 50 criteria analysed to produce a set of 16 consensus core criteria and an additional 29 situational criteria that can apply on a case-by-case basis. This study identified the existence of 16 common values shared among these tree programmes and serves as an initial template for use by current and proposed heritage tree programmes to select ideal candidates. Through this standardised evaluation system, the current patchwork of heritage tree programmes now has the potential to become a unified network leading to the increased awareness and protection of these trees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arboricultural Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"73 - 92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arboricultural Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2020.1814655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arboricultural Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2020.1814655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

遗产树的鉴定和价值是基于这些标本所具有的重要的历史、文化和物理标准。这项研究试图通过确定一套标准化的专家验证的标准来支持遗产树项目,这些标准可以在任何地理位置应用。从对46个案例研究的分析中得出了一套最初的40项标准,并提交给一个遗产树专家小组,以就任何遗产树计划应使用的核心标准达成共识。使用三迭代德尔菲法来评估标准,并允许面板生成额外的内容。结果分析了50个标准,产生了一套16个共识核心标准和另外29个可根据具体情况应用的情景标准。本研究确定了这些树项目共有的16个共同价值,并作为当前和拟议的遗产树项目使用的初始模板,以选择理想的候选项目。通过这个标准化的评估系统,目前零散的遗产树项目现在有可能成为一个统一的网络,从而提高对这些树木的认识和保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing consensus criteria for determining heritage tree status
ABSTRACT Heritage trees are identified and valued based on important historical, cultural and physical criteria that these specimens possess. This research attempts to support heritage tree programmes by identifying a standardised set of expert-verified criteria that can be applied regardless of geographic location. An initial set of 40 criteria were derived from an analysis of 46 case studies and presented to a panel of heritage tree experts to obtain consensus on the core criteria that should be used by any heritage tree programme. A three iteration Delphi method was used to evaluate the criteria and allowed additional content to be generated by the panel. The result saw 50 criteria analysed to produce a set of 16 consensus core criteria and an additional 29 situational criteria that can apply on a case-by-case basis. This study identified the existence of 16 common values shared among these tree programmes and serves as an initial template for use by current and proposed heritage tree programmes to select ideal candidates. Through this standardised evaluation system, the current patchwork of heritage tree programmes now has the potential to become a unified network leading to the increased awareness and protection of these trees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arboricultural Journal
Arboricultural Journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Arboricultural Journal is published and issued free to members* of the Arboricultural Association. It contains valuable technical, research and scientific information about all aspects of arboriculture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信