种族化的暂时性和修辞暴力

IF 1.3 2区文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION

Quarterly Journal of Speech Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00335630.2023.2165233

Lisa A. Flores

{"title":"种族化的暂时性和修辞暴力","authors":"Lisa A. Flores","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2023.2165233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Reflecting upon the words of Professors De Genova, Lozano, and Yam, this essay suggests that rhetorical scholars attend to the intersections between rhetorical violence and rhetorical temporalities. The varied projects that emerge in this forum together suggest that the racialized temporalities of violence rely upon temporalities of relentless and repetition. Together, relentlessness and repetition make race. They do so, within white supremacy and antiblackness, by demanding a particular racist recognition, a seeing and sensing of race premised in antiblackness.","PeriodicalId":51545,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","volume":"17 1","pages":"103 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racialized temporalities and rhetorical violence\",\"authors\":\"Lisa A. Flores\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00335630.2023.2165233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Reflecting upon the words of Professors De Genova, Lozano, and Yam, this essay suggests that rhetorical scholars attend to the intersections between rhetorical violence and rhetorical temporalities. The varied projects that emerge in this forum together suggest that the racialized temporalities of violence rely upon temporalities of relentless and repetition. Together, relentlessness and repetition make race. They do so, within white supremacy and antiblackness, by demanding a particular racist recognition, a seeing and sensing of race premised in antiblackness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Speech\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"103 - 107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Speech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2023.2165233\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2023.2165233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

通过对De Genova、Lozano和Yam教授的反思，本文认为修辞学学者应该关注修辞暴力和修辞时间性之间的交叉点。在这个论坛上出现的各种各样的项目共同表明，暴力的种族临时性依赖于无情和重复的临时性。不懈和重复共同构成了种族。他们这样做，在白人至上主义和反黑人主义的框架下，通过要求一种特定的种族主义承认，一种以反黑人主义为前提的对种族的认识和感知。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Racialized temporalities and rhetorical violence

ABSTRACT Reflecting upon the words of Professors De Genova, Lozano, and Yam, this essay suggests that rhetorical scholars attend to the intersections between rhetorical violence and rhetorical temporalities. The varied projects that emerge in this forum together suggest that the racialized temporalities of violence rely upon temporalities of relentless and repetition. Together, relentlessness and repetition make race. They do so, within white supremacy and antiblackness, by demanding a particular racist recognition, a seeing and sensing of race premised in antiblackness.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Quarterly Journal of Speech COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

36.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Quarterly Journal of Speech (QJS) publishes articles and book reviews of interest to those who take a rhetorical perspective on the texts, discourses, and cultural practices by which public beliefs and identities are constituted, empowered, and enacted. Rhetorical scholarship now cuts across many different intellectual, disciplinary, and political vectors, and QJS seeks to honor and address the interanimating effects of such differences. No single project, whether modern or postmodern in its orientation, or local, national, or global in its scope, can suffice as the sole locus of rhetorical practice, knowledge and understanding.