伊斯兰教神秘科学的理论与实践

IF 0.4 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION
J. Hämeen-Anttila
{"title":"伊斯兰教神秘科学的理论与实践","authors":"J. Hämeen-Anttila","doi":"10.1080/09596410.2022.2052669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"emphasize the military campaigns based on their interpretation of the literary history, archaeological evidence does not always support this as the main means of the Arab expansion into all the geographical areas they took under their control. Given the complexity of the evidence, Sirry emphasizes that dialogue between scholars is essential because a reductionist approach cannot provide the full picture. Sirry wants the scholars in each camp to be self-critical. Historians may prefer sources that are contemporaneous with the events they recount, but there is no guarantee that all the details they record are authentic. In our own time, we can see how misinformation can be recorded and disseminated. Future historians may debate the facts concerning events happening today because the sources they will have, though plentiful, are highly conflicting. Indeed, it is difficult, even for people alive today, to discern truth from falsehood concerning contemporary events. Contemporaneous sources are not necessarily superior unless they are engaged with critically, and so Sirry is correct in saying that one needs to keep an open mind and be self-critical, regardless of the camp to which one belongs. I highly recommend this book for students, scholars and anyone interested in the history of early Islam. It provides extensive references to the wide variety of scholarship in the field that will be useful to any researcher in the field. It details the nature of the academic controversies, giving a very balanced assessment of the arguments and counter-arguments made by each party. Sirry highlights both the strengths and weaknesses of each and shows convincingly that, while some approaches may appear to conflict, they are sometimes actually closer than they seem. Sirry calls on scholars to appreciate the diverse theories, enter into constructive dialogue, and avoid polemics. How can anyone who seeks to know the truth of historical events be polemical? How can constructive dialogue not be beneficial? Sirry’s very positive outlook regarding the result of such dialogue for the field of qur’anic studies is something that I am sure everyone can appreciate. This book will certainly be on the reading list for my own students.","PeriodicalId":45172,"journal":{"name":"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Islamicate Occult Sciences in Theory and Practice\",\"authors\":\"J. Hämeen-Anttila\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09596410.2022.2052669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"emphasize the military campaigns based on their interpretation of the literary history, archaeological evidence does not always support this as the main means of the Arab expansion into all the geographical areas they took under their control. Given the complexity of the evidence, Sirry emphasizes that dialogue between scholars is essential because a reductionist approach cannot provide the full picture. Sirry wants the scholars in each camp to be self-critical. Historians may prefer sources that are contemporaneous with the events they recount, but there is no guarantee that all the details they record are authentic. In our own time, we can see how misinformation can be recorded and disseminated. Future historians may debate the facts concerning events happening today because the sources they will have, though plentiful, are highly conflicting. Indeed, it is difficult, even for people alive today, to discern truth from falsehood concerning contemporary events. Contemporaneous sources are not necessarily superior unless they are engaged with critically, and so Sirry is correct in saying that one needs to keep an open mind and be self-critical, regardless of the camp to which one belongs. I highly recommend this book for students, scholars and anyone interested in the history of early Islam. It provides extensive references to the wide variety of scholarship in the field that will be useful to any researcher in the field. It details the nature of the academic controversies, giving a very balanced assessment of the arguments and counter-arguments made by each party. Sirry highlights both the strengths and weaknesses of each and shows convincingly that, while some approaches may appear to conflict, they are sometimes actually closer than they seem. Sirry calls on scholars to appreciate the diverse theories, enter into constructive dialogue, and avoid polemics. How can anyone who seeks to know the truth of historical events be polemical? How can constructive dialogue not be beneficial? Sirry’s very positive outlook regarding the result of such dialogue for the field of qur’anic studies is something that I am sure everyone can appreciate. This book will certainly be on the reading list for my own students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2022.2052669\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2022.2052669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强调基于他们对文学史的解释的军事行动,考古证据并不总是支持这是阿拉伯人向他们控制的所有地理区域扩张的主要手段。考虑到证据的复杂性,Sirry强调学者之间的对话是必要的,因为还原主义的方法不能提供全貌。Sirry希望每个阵营的学者都能自我批判。历史学家可能更喜欢与他们所叙述的事件同时代的资料来源,但不能保证他们记录的所有细节都是真实的。在我们自己的时代,我们可以看到错误信息是如何被记录和传播的。未来的历史学家可能会对今天发生的事件的事实进行辩论,因为他们将拥有的资料来源虽然丰富,但却是高度矛盾的。事实上,即使对今天的人来说,也很难辨别关于当代事件的真伪。同时期的资料不一定是优越的,除非它们是批判性的,所以Sirry说一个人需要保持开放的心态和自我批评是正确的,不管一个人属于哪个阵营。我强烈推荐这本书给学生、学者和任何对早期伊斯兰历史感兴趣的人。它提供了广泛的参考,在该领域的各种各样的奖学金,这将是有用的任何研究者在该领域。它详细描述了学术争议的性质,对双方的论点和反论点进行了非常平衡的评估。《Sirry》突出了每一种方法的优点和缺点,并令人信服地表明,尽管有些方法可能看起来是冲突的,但它们有时实际上比看起来更接近。瑟利呼吁学者们欣赏不同的理论,进行建设性的对话,避免争论。一个想要了解历史事件真相的人怎么会喜欢争论呢?建设性对话怎么会不是有益的呢?Sirry对古兰经研究领域的这种对话结果的非常积极的看法,我相信每个人都能欣赏。这本书肯定会在我的学生的阅读清单上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Islamicate Occult Sciences in Theory and Practice
emphasize the military campaigns based on their interpretation of the literary history, archaeological evidence does not always support this as the main means of the Arab expansion into all the geographical areas they took under their control. Given the complexity of the evidence, Sirry emphasizes that dialogue between scholars is essential because a reductionist approach cannot provide the full picture. Sirry wants the scholars in each camp to be self-critical. Historians may prefer sources that are contemporaneous with the events they recount, but there is no guarantee that all the details they record are authentic. In our own time, we can see how misinformation can be recorded and disseminated. Future historians may debate the facts concerning events happening today because the sources they will have, though plentiful, are highly conflicting. Indeed, it is difficult, even for people alive today, to discern truth from falsehood concerning contemporary events. Contemporaneous sources are not necessarily superior unless they are engaged with critically, and so Sirry is correct in saying that one needs to keep an open mind and be self-critical, regardless of the camp to which one belongs. I highly recommend this book for students, scholars and anyone interested in the history of early Islam. It provides extensive references to the wide variety of scholarship in the field that will be useful to any researcher in the field. It details the nature of the academic controversies, giving a very balanced assessment of the arguments and counter-arguments made by each party. Sirry highlights both the strengths and weaknesses of each and shows convincingly that, while some approaches may appear to conflict, they are sometimes actually closer than they seem. Sirry calls on scholars to appreciate the diverse theories, enter into constructive dialogue, and avoid polemics. How can anyone who seeks to know the truth of historical events be polemical? How can constructive dialogue not be beneficial? Sirry’s very positive outlook regarding the result of such dialogue for the field of qur’anic studies is something that I am sure everyone can appreciate. This book will certainly be on the reading list for my own students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations (ICMR) provides a forum for the academic exploration and discussion of the religious tradition of Islam, and of relations between Islam and other religions. It is edited by members of the Department of Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. The editors welcome articles on all aspects of Islam, and particularly on: •the religion and culture of Islam, historical and contemporary •Islam and its relations with other faiths and ideologies •Christian-Muslim relations. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations is a refereed, academic journal. It publishes articles, documentation and reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信