{"title":"城镇工资溢价的边做边学解释检验","authors":"Bonggeun Kim","doi":"10.17256/JER.2011.16.2.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We test if the measured large and stable urban wage premium is related to acquired skill differentials between urban and non-urban workers. We newly document (1) a large urban premium is not fully explained by the differences in the cost of living and (2) urban workers do not experience higher wage growth than non-urban workers. These empirical findings contradict the learning-by-doing explanation for the urban wage premium and they can be fully explained by a gradual ability sorting hypothesis in which more able workers gravitate to urban areas.","PeriodicalId":90860,"journal":{"name":"International journal of economic research","volume":"37 1","pages":"211-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Test of the Learning-by-Doing Explanation for the Urban Wage Premium\",\"authors\":\"Bonggeun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17256/JER.2011.16.2.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We test if the measured large and stable urban wage premium is related to acquired skill differentials between urban and non-urban workers. We newly document (1) a large urban premium is not fully explained by the differences in the cost of living and (2) urban workers do not experience higher wage growth than non-urban workers. These empirical findings contradict the learning-by-doing explanation for the urban wage premium and they can be fully explained by a gradual ability sorting hypothesis in which more able workers gravitate to urban areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of economic research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"211-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of economic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2011.16.2.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of economic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2011.16.2.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Test of the Learning-by-Doing Explanation for the Urban Wage Premium
We test if the measured large and stable urban wage premium is related to acquired skill differentials between urban and non-urban workers. We newly document (1) a large urban premium is not fully explained by the differences in the cost of living and (2) urban workers do not experience higher wage growth than non-urban workers. These empirical findings contradict the learning-by-doing explanation for the urban wage premium and they can be fully explained by a gradual ability sorting hypothesis in which more able workers gravitate to urban areas.