城镇工资溢价的边做边学解释检验

Bonggeun Kim
{"title":"城镇工资溢价的边做边学解释检验","authors":"Bonggeun Kim","doi":"10.17256/JER.2011.16.2.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We test if the measured large and stable urban wage premium is related to acquired skill differentials between urban and non-urban workers. We newly document (1) a large urban premium is not fully explained by the differences in the cost of living and (2) urban workers do not experience higher wage growth than non-urban workers. These empirical findings contradict the learning-by-doing explanation for the urban wage premium and they can be fully explained by a gradual ability sorting hypothesis in which more able workers gravitate to urban areas.","PeriodicalId":90860,"journal":{"name":"International journal of economic research","volume":"37 1","pages":"211-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Test of the Learning-by-Doing Explanation for the Urban Wage Premium\",\"authors\":\"Bonggeun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17256/JER.2011.16.2.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We test if the measured large and stable urban wage premium is related to acquired skill differentials between urban and non-urban workers. We newly document (1) a large urban premium is not fully explained by the differences in the cost of living and (2) urban workers do not experience higher wage growth than non-urban workers. These empirical findings contradict the learning-by-doing explanation for the urban wage premium and they can be fully explained by a gradual ability sorting hypothesis in which more able workers gravitate to urban areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of economic research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"211-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of economic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2011.16.2.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of economic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2011.16.2.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们检验了测量到的大而稳定的城市工资溢价是否与城市和非城市工人之间的获得性技能差异有关。我们最新的研究表明:(1)城市的高溢价并不能完全用生活成本的差异来解释;(2)城市工人的工资增长并不比非城市工人高。这些实证研究结果与城市工资溢价的“边干边学”解释相矛盾,它们可以用一个渐进的能力分类假说来充分解释,在这个假说中,更多有能力的工人被吸引到城市地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Test of the Learning-by-Doing Explanation for the Urban Wage Premium
We test if the measured large and stable urban wage premium is related to acquired skill differentials between urban and non-urban workers. We newly document (1) a large urban premium is not fully explained by the differences in the cost of living and (2) urban workers do not experience higher wage growth than non-urban workers. These empirical findings contradict the learning-by-doing explanation for the urban wage premium and they can be fully explained by a gradual ability sorting hypothesis in which more able workers gravitate to urban areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信