Mirko Bošković
{"title":"IZUZECI OD NEPOSREDNOG IZVOĐENJA DOKAZA I PRIVILEGOVANI SVJEDOCI U KRIVIČNOM POSTUPKU CRNE GORE","authors":"Mirko Bošković","doi":"10.47152/rkkp.60.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses practical issues when applying legal provisions dealing with the exemptions from direct presentation of evidence in the context of provisions on persons released from the duty to testify in criminal proceedings in Montenegro. After the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code from 2015, the possibility of using the testimony of privileged witnesses from the investigation was introduced into the legislation, in situations when they exercise their right and refuse to testify at the main hearing. There will be explanation of standards of the European Court of Human Rights, the characteristics of the normative framework for exceptions to the principle of immediacy in the CPC of Montenegro, and the way in which our case law treats these issues. Finally, appropriate conclusions were drawn regarding the obvious conflict of norms, which arose after the mentioned legal amendments, and the potential violation of the rights of defendants to a fair trial due to their (inadequate) application.","PeriodicalId":85724,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.60.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了在黑山刑事诉讼中免除作证义务的人的规定的背景下,适用关于免除直接出示证据的法律规定时的实际问题。从2015年开始修改《刑事诉讼法》后,立法中规定,在调查特权证人行使权利而拒绝在主要听证会上作证的情况下,可以使用特权证人的证词。将会解释欧洲人权法院的标准,黑山共和国的直接原则例外的规范框架的特点,以及我国判例法处理这些问题的方式。最后,对于上述法律修正案之后出现的明显的规范冲突,以及由于(不充分的)适用而可能侵犯被告获得公平审判的权利,得出了适当的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IZUZECI OD NEPOSREDNOG IZVOĐENJA DOKAZA I PRIVILEGOVANI SVJEDOCI U KRIVIČNOM POSTUPKU CRNE GORE
This paper analyses practical issues when applying legal provisions dealing with the exemptions from direct presentation of evidence in the context of provisions on persons released from the duty to testify in criminal proceedings in Montenegro. After the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code from 2015, the possibility of using the testimony of privileged witnesses from the investigation was introduced into the legislation, in situations when they exercise their right and refuse to testify at the main hearing. There will be explanation of standards of the European Court of Human Rights, the characteristics of the normative framework for exceptions to the principle of immediacy in the CPC of Montenegro, and the way in which our case law treats these issues. Finally, appropriate conclusions were drawn regarding the obvious conflict of norms, which arose after the mentioned legal amendments, and the potential violation of the rights of defendants to a fair trial due to their (inadequate) application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信