寻找个人起源:美国教育传记

D. Warren
{"title":"寻找个人起源:美国教育传记","authors":"D. Warren","doi":"10.1086/443454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most historians are willing to admit that biography is one of their more difficult assignments. Methodological problems are legend, not the least of which is assessing the utility of a subject's private papers. In addition there is the difficulty of identifying and weighing the webs of intellectual, social, and psychological influences without being distracted from the primary focus: the reconstruction of a particular life. The problems are compounded in that they are easily missed by unwary or untrained eyes. Given the complexities, it is not surprising that few biographies achieve analytical balance. The gaps in historical knowledge that follow are evident throughout the field, but they are especially notable in education history. To be candid, the problem with education biography is not that a vacuum exists but rather that what we have is largely vacuous. Two of the studies included in this review tend to fall within that sad tradition. Neither of them adds significantly to our knowledge of the critical personalities who shaped nineteenth-century American education although, to be fair, Gutek's study, the best of the three, focuses intentionally on one of the early and minor characters in that development. Frederick Augustus Porter Barnard, of course, was not a minor character. A New Englander by birth, whose life spanned almost a full century (1809-89), he is best known for his 25-year tenure as president of Columbia College from 1864 to 1889. Barnard College carries his name, an institution founded as a \"women's annex\" after the","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"112 1","pages":"72 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Search of Personal Origins: American Educational Biographies\",\"authors\":\"D. Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/443454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most historians are willing to admit that biography is one of their more difficult assignments. Methodological problems are legend, not the least of which is assessing the utility of a subject's private papers. In addition there is the difficulty of identifying and weighing the webs of intellectual, social, and psychological influences without being distracted from the primary focus: the reconstruction of a particular life. The problems are compounded in that they are easily missed by unwary or untrained eyes. Given the complexities, it is not surprising that few biographies achieve analytical balance. The gaps in historical knowledge that follow are evident throughout the field, but they are especially notable in education history. To be candid, the problem with education biography is not that a vacuum exists but rather that what we have is largely vacuous. Two of the studies included in this review tend to fall within that sad tradition. Neither of them adds significantly to our knowledge of the critical personalities who shaped nineteenth-century American education although, to be fair, Gutek's study, the best of the three, focuses intentionally on one of the early and minor characters in that development. Frederick Augustus Porter Barnard, of course, was not a minor character. A New Englander by birth, whose life spanned almost a full century (1809-89), he is best known for his 25-year tenure as president of Columbia College from 1864 to 1889. Barnard College carries his name, an institution founded as a \\\"women's annex\\\" after the\",\"PeriodicalId\":83260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The School science review\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The School science review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/443454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/443454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

大多数历史学家都愿意承认传记是他们比较困难的工作之一。方法上的问题是传说,其中最重要的是评估一个主题的私人论文的效用。此外,在不偏离主要焦点的情况下,识别和权衡智力、社会和心理影响的网络也很困难:重建特定的生活。问题更复杂的是,它们很容易被粗心或未经训练的眼睛忽略。考虑到传记的复杂性,很少有传记能达到分析上的平衡也就不足为奇了。随之而来的历史知识差距在整个领域都很明显,但在教育史上尤为显著。坦率地说,教育传记的问题不在于存在真空,而在于我们所拥有的大部分是真空的。这篇综述中包含的两项研究往往属于这种可悲的传统。他们都没有显著地增加我们对塑造19世纪美国教育的批判性人物的了解,尽管,公平地说,Gutek的研究是三人中最好的,他有意地关注了这一发展的早期和次要人物之一。弗雷德里克·奥古斯都·波特·巴纳德当然不是一个小角色。他出生在新英格兰,一生跨度近一个世纪(1809- 1889),最著名的是他在1864年至1889年期间担任哥伦比亚学院院长,任期长达25年。巴纳德学院(Barnard College)以他的名字命名
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Search of Personal Origins: American Educational Biographies
Most historians are willing to admit that biography is one of their more difficult assignments. Methodological problems are legend, not the least of which is assessing the utility of a subject's private papers. In addition there is the difficulty of identifying and weighing the webs of intellectual, social, and psychological influences without being distracted from the primary focus: the reconstruction of a particular life. The problems are compounded in that they are easily missed by unwary or untrained eyes. Given the complexities, it is not surprising that few biographies achieve analytical balance. The gaps in historical knowledge that follow are evident throughout the field, but they are especially notable in education history. To be candid, the problem with education biography is not that a vacuum exists but rather that what we have is largely vacuous. Two of the studies included in this review tend to fall within that sad tradition. Neither of them adds significantly to our knowledge of the critical personalities who shaped nineteenth-century American education although, to be fair, Gutek's study, the best of the three, focuses intentionally on one of the early and minor characters in that development. Frederick Augustus Porter Barnard, of course, was not a minor character. A New Englander by birth, whose life spanned almost a full century (1809-89), he is best known for his 25-year tenure as president of Columbia College from 1864 to 1889. Barnard College carries his name, an institution founded as a "women's annex" after the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信