基于系统文献综述(SLR)的步行性研究趋势探析

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Linda Hijriyah, A. Alias, Mohd Firrdhaus Mohd Sahabuddin
{"title":"基于系统文献综述(SLR)的步行性研究趋势探析","authors":"Linda Hijriyah, A. Alias, Mohd Firrdhaus Mohd Sahabuddin","doi":"10.1108/ohi-02-2023-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study intends to analyze the trend of walkability research over two years (2021–2022) in several aspects, including the research problem, gap and aim underlying walkability issues, research setting, the scale of analysis, the type of data, the data collection tool, the analysis method and contribution.Design/methodology/approachPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is employed to conduct a systematic literature review from three leading databases including Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and Sage.FindingsFrom the review, it can be concluded that the research focuses on two aspects, namely, the built environment and people. The studies in this field are conducted at different scales of the built environment, from macroscale to microscale, including region, city, neighborhood and street-level studies that are conducted around the world including Asia, Europe and America which receive high attention from researchers. Meanwhile, the study of walkability in Australia and Africa gains less attention. It is revealed that there are four factors of walkability including land use and accessibility for macroscale which cover region, city and neighborhood, while street network and pedestrian infrastructure and facility are mainly analyzed for street-level. Most of the studies widely utilize a quantitative approach for analyzing physical walkability factors in a measurement-based approach by using certain tools/software, and a perception-based approach by using questionnaires.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings can assist to keep up with the rapid pace of scientific publications and help accelerate the understanding of particular ideas in the field of walkability for the planning and design practice and policy that can be used by researchers/academia, urban designers, urban planners, architects, engineers and policymakers. Also, this study hopefully could assist further research direction for the future and could add value to a more advanced way of understanding the research on walkability.Originality/valueThis research provides a robust framework for walkability trend analysis and a comprehensive understanding of the main ideas from the existing research on walkability worldwide.","PeriodicalId":44969,"journal":{"name":"Open House International","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring walkability research trends based on systematic literature review (SLR) by applying PRISMA\",\"authors\":\"Linda Hijriyah, A. Alias, Mohd Firrdhaus Mohd Sahabuddin\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ohi-02-2023-0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study intends to analyze the trend of walkability research over two years (2021–2022) in several aspects, including the research problem, gap and aim underlying walkability issues, research setting, the scale of analysis, the type of data, the data collection tool, the analysis method and contribution.Design/methodology/approachPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is employed to conduct a systematic literature review from three leading databases including Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and Sage.FindingsFrom the review, it can be concluded that the research focuses on two aspects, namely, the built environment and people. The studies in this field are conducted at different scales of the built environment, from macroscale to microscale, including region, city, neighborhood and street-level studies that are conducted around the world including Asia, Europe and America which receive high attention from researchers. Meanwhile, the study of walkability in Australia and Africa gains less attention. It is revealed that there are four factors of walkability including land use and accessibility for macroscale which cover region, city and neighborhood, while street network and pedestrian infrastructure and facility are mainly analyzed for street-level. Most of the studies widely utilize a quantitative approach for analyzing physical walkability factors in a measurement-based approach by using certain tools/software, and a perception-based approach by using questionnaires.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings can assist to keep up with the rapid pace of scientific publications and help accelerate the understanding of particular ideas in the field of walkability for the planning and design practice and policy that can be used by researchers/academia, urban designers, urban planners, architects, engineers and policymakers. Also, this study hopefully could assist further research direction for the future and could add value to a more advanced way of understanding the research on walkability.Originality/valueThis research provides a robust framework for walkability trend analysis and a comprehensive understanding of the main ideas from the existing research on walkability worldwide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open House International\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open House International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-02-2023-0031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open House International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-02-2023-0031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究拟从研究问题、可步行性问题的差距和目标、研究背景、分析规模、数据类型、数据收集工具、分析方法和贡献等几个方面分析未来两年(2021-2022年)的可步行性研究趋势。设计/方法/方法采用PRISMA (preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta - analysis)对Web of Science (WoS)、Scopus和Sage这三个领先的数据库进行系统文献综述。从综述中可以看出,研究主要集中在两个方面,即建筑环境和人。该领域的研究涉及从宏观尺度到微观尺度的不同建筑环境尺度,包括区域、城市、社区和街道层面的研究,这些研究在亚洲、欧洲和美洲等世界各地开展,受到研究者的高度关注。与此同时,对澳大利亚和非洲的可步行性的研究却很少受到关注。研究发现,在宏观尺度上,可步行性包括土地利用和可达性四个因素,覆盖区域、城市和街区,而街道网络和步行基础设施主要在街道层面进行分析。大多数研究广泛采用基于测量的方法和基于感知的方法(通过问卷调查)来分析身体可步行性因素。研究的局限/启示研究结果有助于跟上科学出版物的快速步伐,并有助于加快对规划和设计实践和政策领域的特定思想的理解,这些思想可以被研究人员/学术界、城市设计师、城市规划者、建筑师、工程师和政策制定者使用。同时,本研究也有望为未来的研究方向提供帮助,并为更先进地理解步行性研究提供价值。独创性/价值本研究为步行性趋势分析提供了一个强有力的框架,并对世界范围内现有的步行性研究的主要思想进行了全面的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring walkability research trends based on systematic literature review (SLR) by applying PRISMA
PurposeThis study intends to analyze the trend of walkability research over two years (2021–2022) in several aspects, including the research problem, gap and aim underlying walkability issues, research setting, the scale of analysis, the type of data, the data collection tool, the analysis method and contribution.Design/methodology/approachPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is employed to conduct a systematic literature review from three leading databases including Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and Sage.FindingsFrom the review, it can be concluded that the research focuses on two aspects, namely, the built environment and people. The studies in this field are conducted at different scales of the built environment, from macroscale to microscale, including region, city, neighborhood and street-level studies that are conducted around the world including Asia, Europe and America which receive high attention from researchers. Meanwhile, the study of walkability in Australia and Africa gains less attention. It is revealed that there are four factors of walkability including land use and accessibility for macroscale which cover region, city and neighborhood, while street network and pedestrian infrastructure and facility are mainly analyzed for street-level. Most of the studies widely utilize a quantitative approach for analyzing physical walkability factors in a measurement-based approach by using certain tools/software, and a perception-based approach by using questionnaires.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings can assist to keep up with the rapid pace of scientific publications and help accelerate the understanding of particular ideas in the field of walkability for the planning and design practice and policy that can be used by researchers/academia, urban designers, urban planners, architects, engineers and policymakers. Also, this study hopefully could assist further research direction for the future and could add value to a more advanced way of understanding the research on walkability.Originality/valueThis research provides a robust framework for walkability trend analysis and a comprehensive understanding of the main ideas from the existing research on walkability worldwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The journal of an association of institues and individuals concerned with housing, design and development in the built environment. Theories, tools and pratice with special emphasis on the local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信