六相永磁同步电机模型预测控制策略比较

P. Gonçalves, S. Cruz, A. Mendes
{"title":"六相永磁同步电机模型预测控制策略比较","authors":"P. Gonçalves, S. Cruz, A. Mendes","doi":"10.1109/IECON.2018.8591239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative study between different finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) strategies for electric drives based on the six-phase permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) with surface mounted permanent magnets (PMs). Special emphasis is given to predictive current control (PCC) and predictive torque control (PTC) strategies, where a proportional-integral (PI) controller is used to generate the reference value of the torque-producing current component or the reference torque. Simulation results obtained with the different control strategies are presented, their performance is compared, and their strengths and weaknesses are analyzed.","PeriodicalId":13098,"journal":{"name":"IECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society","volume":"79 1","pages":"5801-5806"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Model Predictive Control Strategies for Six-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines\",\"authors\":\"P. Gonçalves, S. Cruz, A. Mendes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IECON.2018.8591239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparative study between different finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) strategies for electric drives based on the six-phase permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) with surface mounted permanent magnets (PMs). Special emphasis is given to predictive current control (PCC) and predictive torque control (PTC) strategies, where a proportional-integral (PI) controller is used to generate the reference value of the torque-producing current component or the reference torque. Simulation results obtained with the different control strategies are presented, their performance is compared, and their strengths and weaknesses are analyzed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"5801-5806\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2018.8591239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2018.8591239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

对基于表面贴装永磁的六相永磁同步电机的不同有限控制集模型预测控制(FCS-MPC)策略进行比较研究。特别强调预测电流控制(PCC)和预测转矩控制(PTC)策略,其中比例积分(PI)控制器用于生成产生转矩的电流分量或参考转矩的参考值。给出了不同控制策略下的仿真结果,比较了不同控制策略的性能,分析了不同控制策略的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Model Predictive Control Strategies for Six-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines
This paper presents a comparative study between different finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) strategies for electric drives based on the six-phase permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) with surface mounted permanent magnets (PMs). Special emphasis is given to predictive current control (PCC) and predictive torque control (PTC) strategies, where a proportional-integral (PI) controller is used to generate the reference value of the torque-producing current component or the reference torque. Simulation results obtained with the different control strategies are presented, their performance is compared, and their strengths and weaknesses are analyzed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信