Erika Godde, G. Bailly, D. Escudero, Marie-Line Bosse, Estelle Gillet-Perret
{"title":"小学生阅读成绩评价:客观测量与主观评分","authors":"Erika Godde, G. Bailly, D. Escudero, Marie-Line Bosse, Estelle Gillet-Perret","doi":"10.21437/WOCCI.2017-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze here readings of the same reference text by 116 children. We show that several factors strongly impact subjective rating of fluency, notably number of correct words, repetitions, errors, syllables spelled per minute. We succeeded in predicting four subjective scores – rated between 1 and 4 by human raters – from such objective measurements with a rather high precision (R > .8 for 3 out of 4 scores). This open the way for automatic multidimensional assessment of reading fluency using calibrated texts.","PeriodicalId":91973,"journal":{"name":"The ... Workshop on Child, Computer and Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of reading performance of primary school children: Objective measurements vs. subjective ratings\",\"authors\":\"Erika Godde, G. Bailly, D. Escudero, Marie-Line Bosse, Estelle Gillet-Perret\",\"doi\":\"10.21437/WOCCI.2017-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyze here readings of the same reference text by 116 children. We show that several factors strongly impact subjective rating of fluency, notably number of correct words, repetitions, errors, syllables spelled per minute. We succeeded in predicting four subjective scores – rated between 1 and 4 by human raters – from such objective measurements with a rather high precision (R > .8 for 3 out of 4 scores). This open the way for automatic multidimensional assessment of reading fluency using calibrated texts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The ... Workshop on Child, Computer and Interaction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The ... Workshop on Child, Computer and Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21437/WOCCI.2017-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ... Workshop on Child, Computer and Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/WOCCI.2017-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of reading performance of primary school children: Objective measurements vs. subjective ratings
We analyze here readings of the same reference text by 116 children. We show that several factors strongly impact subjective rating of fluency, notably number of correct words, repetitions, errors, syllables spelled per minute. We succeeded in predicting four subjective scores – rated between 1 and 4 by human raters – from such objective measurements with a rather high precision (R > .8 for 3 out of 4 scores). This open the way for automatic multidimensional assessment of reading fluency using calibrated texts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
