通过跟踪历史性能改进来度量SYCL实现的成熟度

Wei-Chen Lin, Tom Deakin, Simon McIntosh-Smith
{"title":"通过跟踪历史性能改进来度量SYCL实现的成熟度","authors":"Wei-Chen Lin, Tom Deakin, Simon McIntosh-Smith","doi":"10.1145/3456669.3456701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SYCL is a platform agnostic, single-source, C++ based, parallel programming framework for developing platform independent software for heterogeneous systems. As an emerging framework, SYCL has been under active development for several years, with multiple implementations available from hardware vendors and others. A crucial metric for potential adopters is how mature these implementations are; are they still improving rapidly, indicating that the space is still quite immature, or has performance improvement plateaued, potentially indicating a mature market? This study presents a historical study of the performance delivered by all major SYCL implementations on a range of supported platforms. We use existing HPC-style mini-apps written in SYCL, and benchmark these on current and historical revisions of each SYCL implementation, revealing the rate of change of performance improvements over time. The data indicates that most SYCL implementations are now quite mature, showing rapid performance improvements in the past, slowing to more modest performance improvements more recently. We also compare the most recent SYCL performance to existing well established frameworks, such as OpenCL and OpenMP.","PeriodicalId":73497,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on OpenCL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On measuring the maturity of SYCL implementations by tracking historical performance improvements\",\"authors\":\"Wei-Chen Lin, Tom Deakin, Simon McIntosh-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3456669.3456701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SYCL is a platform agnostic, single-source, C++ based, parallel programming framework for developing platform independent software for heterogeneous systems. As an emerging framework, SYCL has been under active development for several years, with multiple implementations available from hardware vendors and others. A crucial metric for potential adopters is how mature these implementations are; are they still improving rapidly, indicating that the space is still quite immature, or has performance improvement plateaued, potentially indicating a mature market? This study presents a historical study of the performance delivered by all major SYCL implementations on a range of supported platforms. We use existing HPC-style mini-apps written in SYCL, and benchmark these on current and historical revisions of each SYCL implementation, revealing the rate of change of performance improvements over time. The data indicates that most SYCL implementations are now quite mature, showing rapid performance improvements in the past, slowing to more modest performance improvements more recently. We also compare the most recent SYCL performance to existing well established frameworks, such as OpenCL and OpenMP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Workshop on OpenCL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Workshop on OpenCL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3456669.3456701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on OpenCL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3456669.3456701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

SYCL是一个平台无关的、单源的、基于c++的并行编程框架,用于为异构系统开发平台无关的软件。作为一个新兴框架,SYCL已经积极开发了好几年,硬件供应商和其他公司提供了多种实现。潜在采用者的一个关键指标是这些实现有多成熟;他们是否仍在快速改善,这表明该领域仍相当不成熟,或者业绩改善已经停滞不前,这可能表明市场已经成熟?本研究对所有主要SYCL实现在一系列受支持平台上提供的性能进行了历史研究。我们使用用SYCL编写的现有hpc风格的小应用程序,并对每个SYCL实现的当前和历史版本进行基准测试,揭示性能改进随时间的变化速度。数据表明,大多数SYCL实现现在都相当成熟,在过去表现出快速的性能改进,而最近表现出较为温和的性能改进。我们还将最新的SYCL性能与现有的成熟框架(如OpenCL和OpenMP)进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On measuring the maturity of SYCL implementations by tracking historical performance improvements
SYCL is a platform agnostic, single-source, C++ based, parallel programming framework for developing platform independent software for heterogeneous systems. As an emerging framework, SYCL has been under active development for several years, with multiple implementations available from hardware vendors and others. A crucial metric for potential adopters is how mature these implementations are; are they still improving rapidly, indicating that the space is still quite immature, or has performance improvement plateaued, potentially indicating a mature market? This study presents a historical study of the performance delivered by all major SYCL implementations on a range of supported platforms. We use existing HPC-style mini-apps written in SYCL, and benchmark these on current and historical revisions of each SYCL implementation, revealing the rate of change of performance improvements over time. The data indicates that most SYCL implementations are now quite mature, showing rapid performance improvements in the past, slowing to more modest performance improvements more recently. We also compare the most recent SYCL performance to existing well established frameworks, such as OpenCL and OpenMP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信