冲突环境下社会变革方案的利益相关者分析和识别

Q2 Social Sciences
J. C. Gavino, M. D. de Vera, C. Verzosa, Karmela Faustine C. Indoyon, Raizza P. Bello
{"title":"冲突环境下社会变革方案的利益相关者分析和识别","authors":"J. C. Gavino, M. D. de Vera, C. Verzosa, Karmela Faustine C. Indoyon, Raizza P. Bello","doi":"10.1177/1542316620962443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delivering social change programmes is often an intricate, long-term process that can become an arena of contestation with its design for soliciting participation. In dynamic contexts such as conflict-affected areas, delivering social change programmes involves diverse actors, issues, and dimensions that make for complex arrangements. Social change programmes, which can be used interchangeably with social programmes, are defined in the article as programmes intended to improve the quality of life of people or to protect vulnerable groups, especially in disadvantaged communities (Diallo, 2007; Valdez & Bamberger, 1994). In achieving the outcomes of social change programmes, traditional approaches in negotiation and conflict management have been promoted and practised across sectors, drawing from various disciplines such as game theory, behavioural decision research, social psychology, and communications. However, in the pursuit of general application, these approaches have become vulnerable to the oversimplification of social contexts, which may miss critical nuances that could make negotiation and conflict management approaches more robust and flexible in more dynamic contexts.","PeriodicalId":39765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Peacebuilding and Development","volume":"20 1","pages":"259 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholder Analysis and Identification for Social Change Programmes in Conflict Settings\",\"authors\":\"J. C. Gavino, M. D. de Vera, C. Verzosa, Karmela Faustine C. Indoyon, Raizza P. Bello\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1542316620962443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Delivering social change programmes is often an intricate, long-term process that can become an arena of contestation with its design for soliciting participation. In dynamic contexts such as conflict-affected areas, delivering social change programmes involves diverse actors, issues, and dimensions that make for complex arrangements. Social change programmes, which can be used interchangeably with social programmes, are defined in the article as programmes intended to improve the quality of life of people or to protect vulnerable groups, especially in disadvantaged communities (Diallo, 2007; Valdez & Bamberger, 1994). In achieving the outcomes of social change programmes, traditional approaches in negotiation and conflict management have been promoted and practised across sectors, drawing from various disciplines such as game theory, behavioural decision research, social psychology, and communications. However, in the pursuit of general application, these approaches have become vulnerable to the oversimplification of social contexts, which may miss critical nuances that could make negotiation and conflict management approaches more robust and flexible in more dynamic contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Peacebuilding and Development\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"259 - 266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Peacebuilding and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316620962443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Peacebuilding and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316620962443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实施社会变革方案往往是一个复杂而长期的过程,它可以成为征求参与的设计的竞争舞台。在诸如受冲突影响地区等动态环境中,实施社会变革方案涉及不同的行动者、问题和层面,因此需要作出复杂的安排。社会变革方案可以与社会方案互换使用,在文章中定义为旨在提高人们生活质量或保护弱势群体,特别是弱势社区的弱势群体的方案(Diallo, 2007;Valdez & Bamberger, 1994)。为了实现社会变革方案的成果,在谈判和冲突管理方面的传统方法得到了推广和跨部门实践,借鉴了博弈论、行为决策研究、社会心理学和通信等不同学科。然而,在追求普遍应用的过程中,这些方法变得容易受到社会环境过度简化的影响,这可能会错过关键的细微差别,这些细微差别可能使谈判和冲突管理方法在更动态的环境中更加稳健和灵活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stakeholder Analysis and Identification for Social Change Programmes in Conflict Settings
Delivering social change programmes is often an intricate, long-term process that can become an arena of contestation with its design for soliciting participation. In dynamic contexts such as conflict-affected areas, delivering social change programmes involves diverse actors, issues, and dimensions that make for complex arrangements. Social change programmes, which can be used interchangeably with social programmes, are defined in the article as programmes intended to improve the quality of life of people or to protect vulnerable groups, especially in disadvantaged communities (Diallo, 2007; Valdez & Bamberger, 1994). In achieving the outcomes of social change programmes, traditional approaches in negotiation and conflict management have been promoted and practised across sectors, drawing from various disciplines such as game theory, behavioural decision research, social psychology, and communications. However, in the pursuit of general application, these approaches have become vulnerable to the oversimplification of social contexts, which may miss critical nuances that could make negotiation and conflict management approaches more robust and flexible in more dynamic contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Peacebuilding and Development
Journal of Peacebuilding and Development Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Peacebuilding and Development (JPD) is a new publication for the sharing of critical thinking and constructive action at the intersections of conflict, development and peace. JPD"s authors and editorial staff represent global scholarship, practice and action aiming to develop theory-practice and North South dialogue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信