方枘圆凿?MARCH论文与机构资料库

IF 0.2 0 ART
Art Documentation Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1086/709661
R. Price
{"title":"方枘圆凿?MARCH论文与机构资料库","authors":"R. Price","doi":"10.1086/709661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While institutional repositories have changed the landscape of academic publishing and scholarly communication in most disciplines, the creative work of architecture and art and design students and faculty has been left behind. Recent studies sponsored by the National Digital Stewardship Residency (NDSR) Art Information program explore the issue of the MFA thesis as an object for submission to an institutional repository. This article opens the conversation to include the MARCH thesis project. The essay recounts the process of gathering information about current practices and proposes next steps to address the need for best practices, if not standards, for the inclusion of MARCH thesis work in institutional repositories. [The following article is an expansion of discussion sessions organized at the ARLIS/NA conference held in Salt Lake City, Utah, in March 2019, and at the Association of Architecture School Librarians conference held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in March 2019.]","PeriodicalId":43009,"journal":{"name":"Art Documentation","volume":"296 1","pages":"93 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Square Peg in a Round Hole? The MARCH Thesis and the Institutional Repository\",\"authors\":\"R. Price\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/709661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While institutional repositories have changed the landscape of academic publishing and scholarly communication in most disciplines, the creative work of architecture and art and design students and faculty has been left behind. Recent studies sponsored by the National Digital Stewardship Residency (NDSR) Art Information program explore the issue of the MFA thesis as an object for submission to an institutional repository. This article opens the conversation to include the MARCH thesis project. The essay recounts the process of gathering information about current practices and proposes next steps to address the need for best practices, if not standards, for the inclusion of MARCH thesis work in institutional repositories. [The following article is an expansion of discussion sessions organized at the ARLIS/NA conference held in Salt Lake City, Utah, in March 2019, and at the Association of Architecture School Librarians conference held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in March 2019.]\",\"PeriodicalId\":43009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art Documentation\",\"volume\":\"296 1\",\"pages\":\"93 - 100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art Documentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/709661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/709661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然机构知识库已经改变了大多数学科的学术出版和学术交流的格局,但建筑、艺术和设计学生和教师的创造性工作却被抛在了后面。最近由国家数字管理驻留(NDSR)艺术信息计划赞助的研究探讨了MFA论文作为提交给机构存储库的对象的问题。这篇文章开启了对话,包括MARCH论文项目。本文叙述了收集有关当前实践的信息的过程,并提出了下一步的步骤,以解决在机构存储库中包含MARCH论文工作的最佳实践的需求,如果不是标准的话。[以下文章是2019年3月在犹他州盐湖城举行的ARLIS/NA会议和2019年3月在宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡举行的建筑学校图书馆员协会会议上组织的讨论会议的扩展。]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Square Peg in a Round Hole? The MARCH Thesis and the Institutional Repository
While institutional repositories have changed the landscape of academic publishing and scholarly communication in most disciplines, the creative work of architecture and art and design students and faculty has been left behind. Recent studies sponsored by the National Digital Stewardship Residency (NDSR) Art Information program explore the issue of the MFA thesis as an object for submission to an institutional repository. This article opens the conversation to include the MARCH thesis project. The essay recounts the process of gathering information about current practices and proposes next steps to address the need for best practices, if not standards, for the inclusion of MARCH thesis work in institutional repositories. [The following article is an expansion of discussion sessions organized at the ARLIS/NA conference held in Salt Lake City, Utah, in March 2019, and at the Association of Architecture School Librarians conference held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in March 2019.]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信