{"title":"蒙大拿诉怀俄明:洒水装置，灌溉用水效率和重新夺回原则","authors":"Lawrence J. Macdonnell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2691099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Montana v. Wyoming; it discusses the doctrine of recapture; it argues that efficiency improvements in use of water for irrigation are within the scope of the water right.","PeriodicalId":12755,"journal":{"name":"Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Montana v. Wyoming: Sprinklers, Irrigation Water Use Efficiency and the Doctrine of Recapture\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence J. Macdonnell\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2691099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Montana v. Wyoming; it discusses the doctrine of recapture; it argues that efficiency improvements in use of water for irrigation are within the scope of the water right.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2691099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2691099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Montana v. Wyoming: Sprinklers, Irrigation Water Use Efficiency and the Doctrine of Recapture
This paper examines the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Montana v. Wyoming; it discusses the doctrine of recapture; it argues that efficiency improvements in use of water for irrigation are within the scope of the water right.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
